• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Filip

Sky-rendering techniques

138 posts in this topic

The Rules
The GDNet Staff and Moderators are here to ensure a quality experience for all members of the forum. If you break these rules, then you can expect to be put warned or even Banned from the forums (see below). Keeping this in mind, the rules of the forums are as follows:
Topics that you post should be relevant to the forum in which you are posting. This includes posting non-game development related topics in the GDNet Lounge.
Insults and personal attacks on other members will not be tolerated. You are free to disagree and argue with someone else, but insults are where we draw the line.
Posting someone''s personal address or phone number without their consent is forbidden, and may land you in legal trouble as well.
Software piracy is banned from these forums. Posts asking for pirated software or for how to find pirated software will not be tolerated.
Offensive language should be avoided. The forum software automatically censors some words, and GDNet Staff and Moderators may censor others.
Do not spam. It will be deleted as soon as a Staff member or Moderator sees it.
Do not start a topic that condones illegal activities or activities that tend to incite flame wars, such as: drug use, killing, warez, theft, race, nationality, sex, and religion.
Do not use the forums as a personal messenger service. That is what email is for.
People engaging in abusive activities will have their accounts terminated and be permanently banned from GameDev.net. Furthermore, if necessary, we will take whatever steps are needed to report you to your ISP for abuse, and won''t hesitate to contact law enforcement authorities should the nature of the abuse warrant it.
Any posts containing language or images that are inappropriate for viewing at work, at public terminals, or by children are likely to be removed. Members who continually post such things will be warned and eventually banned.
Anyone posting pornographic images, or any other images of an extremely graphic, offensive nature, whether in their original format or modified in some way (such as pixelating them or posting them as ASCII "art"), or posting links to sites containing such images, will be subject to being Banned.


Than someone needs to update their rules because I dont see that listed anywhere.
L8ter
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah I agree that rule is a bit silly. Does that mean you can''t ask a question on an article discussion thread if it''s been dead for a couple of weeks?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The GDNet Staff and Moderators are here to ensure a quality experience for all members of the forum
How can that be when we are not allowed to resurrect a thread after a couple of weeks? If it''s a legit resurrect than whats the big deal? Especially this one, this is the best thread on this site! I can see pornographic material, links to warez, etc., but this?

>>Point. I''ll pass it on. In the meantime, consider it an unwritten rule<<
To whom Kevin? I''m sorry SP, but I just don''t see the reason behind it? What''s your reason? Is it harming anyone? Is it offending someones race, religion, color, etc? Is it causing a business to lose profit due to illegal sharing? I just don''t see why?

And voodoo_john, the answer to your question is yes. Look here: http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=198380

BTW:
I''m not trying to be a jerk. I''m just curious to find out why?

-UltimaX-
Ariel Productions

"You wished for a white christmas... Now go shovel your wishes!"
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by superpig
Most of the people posting in the old topic have probably left by now.


That should answer your question.

If it were me, I''d let a thread go if it was two weeks old, but this isn''t two weeks...
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don''t mind old threads being pulled up, IF the question is related to the subject rather than to a person (unfortunately, in this case it was the latter). A question about if anybody has ideas how to solve a problem is ok, but asking Yann how he did a thing is a wee bit off (and he really won''t answer...). If everybody keeps sky-related questions in here, preferrably on clouds ''cause that''s what the starter asked about, then people can find lots of good resources in one place. Searching would work too of course.
Also, good threads pulled back might be a good way to introduce some material to newcomers who are just out for a look-around and it might inspire them.

Necroing should be kept low, though sometimes it can be a good thing.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The approach people should adopt is to create a new thread with a link to the old, I''ve said this before. That allows people to quickly look at the new information without trawling through the old if they don''t want to. Article Discussion and GDS Feedback are exceptions because you can''t create new topics in their forums.

It''s something of a conceptual modelling thing. If a thread has died, that is because nobody has anything more to say; the discussion has ended. If you want to talk about something in it, you are starting a new discussion. Thus, you should be starting a new thread.

Since the events in this thread, Dave has issued a couple of memos to the mods on necro policy, so I won''t push on-topic necros too hard in future. But I would prefer that you adopt the new-thread-and-link approach I mentioned above, for a number of reasons.

Now, either the necro discussion stops after this post, or I lock the thread. If you take issue with what I''ve said, email me.

Oh, and voodoo_john, don''t think I can''t see you posting anonymously both here and in the Enginuity thread.


Richard "Superpig" Fine
Smoother than a greased baby
[TBRF|GP&T|Enginuity1|Enginuity2|Enginuity3|Enginuity4|Enginuity5]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I sure that necromancy issue on gamedev.net could be solved by comparation with all other forums i know where this is not an issue.

I think ,necromancy became a problem only because "blahblah" posters realized that if they posts blahblah to old topic,it makes more effect than blahblah posted as new topic,because when moderator deletes blahblah,thread remains popped up(correct me if i'm are wrong).

The one advantage of "new with reference to old" over necro that moderator could delete post and old topic are pushed back to graves.But why not just change formu software a bit that lastpost date= post date of last message(so if necroing message are deleted,thread are pushed back to grave). Really,it shouldn't be so hard to change forum soft,unless forum soft are over-bloated.

Also, do you know that in usenet,mesages are also passed with references?
With references to many messages that was before this message,not to one.Like last page of necroed topic.

Really,there's not so much difference between last page of old topic with links "1,2,3,4,5,6" on page and new topic with link to old topic with link to older topic,except only that i have to make more mouse clicks.

So IMHO,sorry,but "new with reference to old" are very stupid idea. Same necro with more mouse clicks required if you want to find what's it originally about.

Really,what, it's so hard to just test in your head what's happen after adding that damn feature?

realmsonline:
subject: 'Sky' , 0 replies.
text:

Original thread "Sky-rendering techniques" Are you going to post some clips of it in motion?



(mods anyway have to say "don't necro",isn't it?.
But we all will just laugh )

Note that when i see
subject: 'Sky-rendering techniques' , 700 replies.
i know that it's necro,and,if i'm not interesting,i may not look at it.And else i don't know if it's necro .

Also, after clicking on Original Thread you have to click on "Original Thread" again and again to find what's OP said.

So "new with reference to old" will not solve any problems.


...

[edited by - Dmytry on February 23, 2004 2:25:23 AM]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by superpig
Oh, and voodoo_john, don't think I can't see you posting anonymously both here and in the Enginuity thread.



Oh really? Amd you know this how? Because the same IP is logged against the same posts? Well, yeah then that _definately_ proves it 's me....

The fact of the matter is that people around here get "promoted" to Mods and suddenly it's concentration camp time.

[Edit] How about less forum trawling and more writing? [/Edit]

[edited by - voodoo_john on February 23, 2004 4:04:04 PM]
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by UltimaX


And voodoo_john, the answer to your question is yes. Look here: http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=198380



Well reading what (unsurprusingly) SP says to the guy: "Necroing a post just to bash Blender? Not a good way to impress me, cgshade." just proves in my mind what other people have said about SP''s holier-than-thou attitude. Seems that Modship has just served to re-affirm this.

Time for a fork.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This is not the lounge. Rules were always a bit different here. It''s about exchanging information, not about someone digging up old crap in the line of "nope". When Yann moderated this forum, things like necro threads never were an issue (and we had almost no offtopic threads on the forum, unlike now). Someone posted the idea of a gamedev Wiki in the suggestion forum. How would you handle your no-necro policy there ? It''s impossible, because Wikis encourage necroing as an active way of completing, updating and possibly correcting information. It''s a good idea, and I don''t see why this should be different right here and right now.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quote:
Original post by superpig
Now, either the necro discussion stops after this post, or I lock the thread. If you take issue with what I''ve said, email me.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.