Jump to content
  • Advertisement

Butabee

Member
  • Content count

    471
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

274 Neutral

About Butabee

  • Rank
    Member
  1. Butabee

    Losing Motivation

    I don't really want to make games unless they look, play, and sound like an AAA game. Problem is I don't think I have the skills to do anything that's AAA in any of these categories. I've never finished a game and looks like I never will. I always lose motivation when I make a model or something because they don't look anything near AAA. Maybe I should look into mobile development?
  2. Butabee

    Max Player Update

    I'm thinking I might spawn powerful NPCs in areas that are too populated that will kill off some of the players and disperse them to a number of spawn points.
  3. Butabee

    Starting at Max Level

    One major problem I have with a linear progession model is that players are removed from most of the world eventually since they have no reason to visit zones with lower level NPCs. I want players to be all over in the game world, and not just camped out in high lvl areas. in fact, I don't even want to split the game world into level based areas.   Maybe I'll make increasingly more powerful NPCs come out to attack players that have a high ratio of kills to deaths. And I could increase XP gain, and the chance for repair materials to drop for players with high deaths to kills.     You guys convinced me I need progression, but what progression can I have that doesn't have a huge power gap from newb to vet?
  4. Butabee

    Starting at Max Level

    I think I may make progression more of a "more options" thing rather than a linear power hike, sort of how FPS games do it. The higher lvl guns are generally better, but not so much to the point that it makes new players powerless.  
  5. Butabee

    Starting at Max Level

    So what would you suggest in place for a game with open PvP to prevent new players from being preyed upon? This is a problem in any MMO with any PvP outside of battlegrounds, and not just full world open PvP.   I think players would be more frusterated from being killed repeatedly from higher level players due to power gaps than they would from losing some XP when they die, when they can actually fight back.   I might make it so new players have a buffer of deaths that won't count towards XP loss or gear decay.     I'm also open to suggestions for how progression could be added without it ruining the experience of new players.
  6. I'm thinking of making new players start at max level and gear but when you die you lose a moderate amount of XP, and your gear takes damage that can only be repaired by getting rare material drops. Gear also decays at a slower rate from combat. Gear can break completely.   I want to start players at max level and gear, because I want to have open PvP. The gear you start with can't be traded, or sold.   There would need to be new character creation restrictions, to prevent players from just making new characters if they died too much and lost levels/gear. I'm thinking, players could only make a new character every 3-6 months.   Just a rough idea. I'm open to refinement suggestions.  
  7. I'm already limiting the updates a player can receive about players and NPCs to only players within a certain distance. My question is, should I also limit the amount of updates to a fixed number? Like if 500 players/NPCs are in range should I only send updates about 200? If all my players are within update range without another limit it could be a 40MB a second upload. Although it's doubtful this will be a common occurrence. NPCs will naturally be spread around, so that's not as much of an issue.
  8. Ragnarok is split up into quite a bit of zones, and even more sub zones if you count only players visible within your screen. A server probably could handle 30k users, but no way in hell are all those players all updating each other at one time. Even 1 byte a second would by 900MB upload. I think your friend exaggerated quite a bit with the "very small number of areas."
  9. Butabee

    Attack/Defense Points

    Maybe I should scale all equipped item's power depending on how many items of either attack or defense are equipped? So a lot of defense items would increase the effectiveness of all other defense items while also lowering the effectiveness of all equipped attack items.
  10. Butabee

    Attack/Defense Points

    Yeah, I think maybe instead of two pools, I should have 1 pool with a slider that slides towards attack or defense when items are equipped.
  11. Butabee

    Attack/Defense Points

    The reason I wanted to make attack drain the defense pool is because I wanted a balance, trade off system. I guess this would only work of you could equip multiple items until your pools are depleted though, since equipping an item of attack or defense in limited slots is already a trade off. Maybe I'll use the attack/defense system for item/implant upgrades instead. I think it would make more sense that way. You could just keep upgrading the items until one of your pools is depleted. I'm not sure if I want to just increase pools at the same rate, or let the player choose yet.
  12. Butabee

    Attack/Defense Points

    Although it could be interesting, no, a player can't equip ten swords. I'm not saying this is definitely going in, I'm still in early development stages but I was thinking of increasing pool sizes as a form of leveling.   It's a sci-fi game so equipment will be mainly implants, guns,shield generators, high tech armor, etc. All items will have categories within their type and for the most part you'd only be able to equip one per category, so you'd have to manage your offensive and defensive items efficiently.   You could equip items of varying power at any pool size. Of coarse with smaller pools, you'd be able to equip a lesser amount of powerful items.
  13. Butabee

    Server Frames Per Second

    So it's pointless to wait it seems, since it just creates more work the next tick.   I mainly just want to process all physics entities within a second while supporting as many as I can. I don't think I need any artificial stalls.
  14. I was thinking about adding a system to my game that includes pure attack and defense items. Items have varying amounts of either attack or defense but never both.   Players will have a limited pool of attack and defense points. Attack and defense points are mutually exclusive. Equipping an item with attack will drain your defense pool by that exact amount of attack, and vice versa.     What are your thoughts on this?
  15. Butabee

    Server Frames Per Second

    It's a little more complicated in this case. I should have specified before but for a Unity server that handles physics I'm not sure I can do any waiting without it affecting the physics since Unity handles the threading, I wouldn't know where to put any stalls.
  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

Participate in the game development conversation and more when you create an account on GameDev.net!

Sign me up!