• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

inprazia

Members
  • Content count

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

107 Neutral

About inprazia

  • Rank
    Member
  1. I'm not using the ALUT lib, just basic OpenAL. Didn't have any problems. Just follow the samples included in the OpenAL SDK.
  2. Hi, [font=arial, sans-serif][size=3]I'm searching for information about a software version of the OpenAL compressor effect. Is there a way to use such effect on a sound device supporting only reverberation and low pass filtering?[/size][/font]
  3. Guys, that ain't rocket science after all. If you have 0 slip, then the linear velocity of the point of the wheel touching the ground is zero, and that's enough to work out a kinetic model.
  4. At first glance it seems that you should eliminate that peace of code: int maxrow = y + 1;
  5. Well, given the fact that you don't know the uncertainty in the input data, the optimal approach would be to apply some kind of least squares fitting. Try to obtain Y equations for your X markers, where Y >= X, describing the transformations you are talking about. Resolve the obtained system of equations by optimizing the least square error iteratively using the Gauss-Newton algorithm. And don't forget to have fun.
  6. It's simple. The atan2f function considers the signs of its two arguments, thus yielding the correct result. By using the atanf function, you loose the sign information.
  7. Try with Perlin noise, it's one of the most used and efficient ways to create realistic height fields. Check this site: [url="http://www.noisemachine.com/talk1"]http://www.noisemachine.com/talk1[/url]
  8. Quote:Original post by MrRowl Quote:Original post by inprazia Using classes for such purposes is very nice and clean, but for time critical situations I'm always using inline functions or even macroses. As the others suggested, the point is to avoid creating temporally objects for such simple operations. It's true that the compiler would optimize the code if told so, but I suggest you to avoid the practice "do whatever you can imagine, the compiler should find about what you meant". Have you actually tested that? I've gone through large amounts of code replacing things like A = B * a + C with inline functions... and found that the result (when compiler optimisations are enabled) is actually slower than the original. So you may have just been obfuscating your code with no benefit... You're right, in this case the class implementation is faster when optimized. But this is not generally true. If T is float, not double, the inline function is faster on my PC. Moreover, once you have some dynamic memory allocation in the class constructor, the inline function would be a much better solution.
  9. Using classes for such purposes is very nice and clean, but for time critical situations I'm always using inline functions or even macroses. As the others suggested, the point is to avoid creating temporally objects for such simple operations. It's true that the compiler would optimize the code if told so, but I suggest you to avoid the practice "do whatever you can imagine, the compiler should find about what you meant".
  10. The way you define your problem, is just the standard definition of the inverse kinematics problem. I miss what is the difference in your case. Anyway, in a 3D world, there is no trivial solution. Even if you simplify the task decreasing the degrees of freedom in the body, the presence of constrains strongly suggests an iterative algorithm.
  11. Hi, from what I remember, your angular velocity quaternion is wrong. Try the following association between rotations and axes: X -> ROLL (p) Y -> PITCH (q) Z -> YAW (r) Also, you don't need the additional scale step, just start with: W = [0 p/2 q/2 r/2] Finally, if you change coordinate systems, it's possible to have inertial effects and thus variable angular velocity. But that's not your case. Have fun transforming.