Jump to content
  • Advertisement

Patrik Malk

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Patrik Malk

  1. I am currently working on my own Game Engine. I plan on making both 2D and 3D games (though as time goes on I think I will end up focusing more on 3D). What would be the best way to implement this? Two separate engines: one 2D and the other 3D or One engine that can handle both I am afraid of over-generalizing the engine and making it worse by trying to cram them both into one engine. On the other hand, it would be a real duplication of effort. Worst of all, wasted if I abandon one or the other But I am leaning toward the latter anyway. I think it would be easier to develop and to switch from one to the other. And a 3D engine needs 2D anyway for HUDs and stuff, so I'm not sure if a separate engine for it would even make sense. What are your opinions on this?
  2. Patrik Malk

    Game Engine *D Design

    SFML should handle pretty much all of that for you. [/quote] Yea but it seems like it would be cheating to not use Win32 to handle DirectX. It wouldn't seem as natural I guess. I think that's it. I finally understand it and I did get it working. So, thank you for your help.
  3. Patrik Malk

    Game Engine *D Design

    You can use factory methods to choose which API at runtime, or preprocessor defines to choose at compile time.[/quote] Why "or"? The preprocessor defines means it can compile on Linux by ignoring the DX/Win32 stuff, the factory methods mean that Windows users can choose at anytime between the three. I'm just wondering if you think that it might be a bad idea somehow. EDIT: If I don't hide the DX11 code stuff when I compile for Windows, then it won't run for XP users right? The other problem is that it wouldn't be just rendering, Windows, sound and input are all using different APIs. Right now for Window creation I am using Win32/SFML, do you think I should just use SDL? Also do you think it would be worth the effort (is it a good idea) to put the rendering code into a separate DLL? EDIT: I have been trying to get it to work. So far it's been working but I have come across a problem: Window *win = new W32Window(); or Window *win = new SFMLWindow(); That's how it works so far. But when I tried to get the DX11 rendering class to work I found a fault in the design. DX needs a window handle. So I thought I would just make a function to return the handle and pass it to the DX class: HWND W32Window::getWindowHandle() { return hWnd; } But the current setup doesn't allow it. Because I am using /Window *win/ instead of /W32Window *win/ I can't use any classes not defined in the base class. But I don't want the base class to have this function because Linux/Mac/anything not Windows, wouldn't know what to do with the type HWND.I could use preprocessor definitions to hide it when compiling for Linux, but won't it start looking ugly when they are all over the place? I could just use W32/SFMLWindow and just manually change between them, but then it's impossible to change at runtime. What should I do?
  4. Patrik Malk

    Language for Web Games?

    It depends on what you want. Flash is the current standard for all major browsers. But of course it doesn't work on the iPad/iPhone and won't work on IE10 (Metro). If that is important to you then you can either build directly for that platform or you can certainly use HTML5+JavaScript. You could port your games, but don't underestimate the work that could turn out to be. If you are more concerned with iPad/iPhone, then directly might be your best bet. HTML5+JavaScript is widely supported but does have its own disadvantages.
  5. Patrik Malk

    3D Model Loading Choices

    I get it now. Thank you for your help.
  6. I am currently playing around with creating a game engine of my own. I have, until now, used .x models. It was quite simple with the built in functionality DirectX provides. But recently I have been moving towards OpenGL. I have also started noticing that .x popularity and support is down. So I am looking for a new model format. Even with libs such as 3dslib, 3ds loading is a pain. I tried Collada, that was a nightmare. (I realize now that it was not meant to be used directly anyway, oh well) But I have seen some advocate a custom format. I am (at first) just planning on creating a really basic testing game, composed primarily of cubes. As such, I don't think that I will need anything more complex than a .obj. My problem will arise when I need something more complex, such as animation. So: What is best? Using an established format, or rolling out my own? (First by using plain .obj but then slowing adding my own functionality to it) (Sorry for the long post without much of a question, I guess what I really want is just some reassurance from the community and to see if there is a general consensus on what is the best course of action)
  7. Patrik Malk

    2D Mouse to 3D position

    Instead of transforming mouse coordinates into 3D, try the other way around: Convert the 3D into 2D, simply disregard the Z-axis and do regular 2D collision checking..
  8. Patrik Malk

    3D Model Loading Choices

    Isn't 3DS a binary format? That's what I figured. When I was first starting out years ago I remember wondering why I couldn't find .x or .3ds or any other model files in the Program Files folder for games. I thought it was because they put them into resource data files. But I guess they do both. So custom format it is then. By binary you mean use iostream ios::binary then create a struct/class and just dump/read it all at once, right? That's always a good thing! Exactly, that's why I'm asking now.
  9. Patrik Malk

    Game Engine *D Design

    [color=#000000][font=Arial]*[/font][color=#000000][font=Arial]By the way, while this thread is still fresh and relavant, if you don't mind[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial]I'm trying to visualize how a multiAPI engine would work, or even how to build a "perfect" engine. There are so many possibilities.[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial]Last time I tried creating three folders, one for each, and modding the classes to use the different APIs while trying to keep the function calls as similar as possible. That way It to change APIs all that is needed is to change the directory, libs and dlls. No code is actually changed because all three have a main engine class that is used the exactly the same way.[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial]Next time I plan on build off of that. I'm looking at it like this: API->Graphics->Engine->Game. The directory would be organized like this:[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial]Engine[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial] DirectX9[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial] DirectX11[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial] OpenGL[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial]Then in the "Engine" dir, could be placed Engine and possible Graphics as they should be exactly the same. The API class and some others would go in the folders. (this way I don't need to have three (or more) copies of Engine.h/.cpp that I need to keep updating. ( I would go nuts! )[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial]What do you guys think? Is that a good plan? Am I (under/over)thinking it?[/font]
  10. Patrik Malk

    Game Engine *D Design

    [color=#000000][font=Arial] [/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial] [/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial]That's a relief.[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial] [/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial]The topic title says "[C++]" [/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial] [/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial] [/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial]I totally agree with both of you.[/font] [color=#000000][font=Arial]At the moment I am just getting back into game programming (took about a year off writing websites, it was a shock to me that C++ doesn't have echo! [/font][color=#000000][font=Arial] )[/font][color=#000000][font=Arial] I did have an engine that could use DX9 or DX11 or SDL+OGL.* But I think I will abandon this and just pick one and focus on that. I think it would be better to have a decent engine using only, say, DX11 (which I could later port to other APIs anyway) compared to a useless engine able to run on everything.[/font] Right? I am trying to build for games, as you both suggested. An engine by itself is unsatisfying, so to be productive I am planning on building the engine up "naturally" in steps: 2D Simple Platformer 3D SImple Platformer (2.5D maybe) 3D Slightly More Complex Platformer Final 3D Platformer Game (I don't know why platformer, guess I was feeling nostalgic. I do intend to work on a wider variety of genres, but I feel it would be detrimental to jump between them now.) I don't even have an artist or an engine yet so to aim for the final thing is a bit unrealistic. Even if somehow I managed to keep interested (I wouldn't) the final product would probably be poor and full of hacks. So this way I just focus more on the features and slowly build up. If the games end up playable great, if not I still learned and gained something from it anyway. (I am going to try to make them at least complete, I haven't finished anything yet so that would also be some good experience for me I think.) What do you guys think? Does it sound practical?
  11. Patrik Malk

    Text Editor

    Also, if you really want to ( reinvent | Improve ) the wheel i suggest you first craft an OS independent graphics abstraction layer, and then build your text editor on top of it. Currently, I only work with Direct3D & GDI , although i guess you can use very easily OpenGL for this task. Then you can embed it wherever you want.[/quote] Although that's quite an interesting idea, it's a bit more than what I'm aiming to do for now. I think I'll use wxWidgets and either wxTextCtrl or Scintilla/SciTE. (Still haven't decided...) Thanks for the help guys!
  12. Patrik Malk

    Text Editor

    I am trying to make a cross-platform text editor. I'm really just in the initial design stages but I think I already hit a problem. Using Win32 to create the menu items and text box would be relatively easy, but it kills platform independence. I could use SDL, it would be much simpler to create window, I could also remove the frame, create my own menu, and make it look all sexy. The problem is the actual text editor. SDL_ttf wouldn't work so great compared to native Win32. What's my best option to do this? Is it possible to use Win32/MFC for the text editing with SDL for window management and stuff? What would replace Win32/MFC on Linux/Mac?
  13. Patrik Malk

    Text Editor

    I looked at both Qt and wxWidgets, it looks like Qt is easier but wxWidgets is faster and more powerful. Which means I am leaning toward wxWidgets. They can both create the natural menus and text boxes. My problem is that Qt and wxWidgets have pretty much full text editors in one function, Scintilla and all. But the point was to start with a basic one like what Win32 gives you and build on it myself. (Unless I'm wrong of course and they provide more basic alternatives, but I didn't find that.) Is there any other way, with or without a windowing toolkit? Something that gives you a basic natural-looking text box that I can improve on myself, like Win32/MFC would give, but platform independent?
  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!