• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

Lngly_

Members
  • Content count

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

162 Neutral

About Lngly_

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. Sorry for bumping but I still have this problem. I've tried adjusting the projection matrix but it didn't help. It sort of works of I use view space distance by doing: dist = dot(eye.xyz, eye.xyz) however the resulting regions arent as big as the frustum splits and they're only decently sized when I'm close to the ground. Any ideas?
  2. OpenGL

    [url="http://www.lighthouse3d.com/tutorials/"]http://www.lighthouse3d.com/tutorials/[/url] in particular http://www.lighthouse3d.com/tutorials/glsl-tutorial/lighting/
  3. [color=#a9a9a9]Turns out it was indeed my shader's fault. I've accessed values for split 3 and 4 while only having set 2 splits up. New problem arose though, see changed OP please[/color].
  4. I implemented cascaded shadow mapping with 4 splits but my problem is, I only get shadows from the split for the smallest frustum. Here's a screenshot demonstrating it: I've checked my farBound values and they all seem correct. So I'm guessing gl_FragCoord.z doesn't do its job or maybe I'm using it wrong (I'm using it as in the nvidia code though). I always end up in the first if, judging from the color [img]http://public.gamedev.net//public/style_emoticons/default/sad.png[/img] Here's the shadow part of my fragment shader: [img]http://i.imgur.com/SCHDO.png[/img] [CODE] vec4 getShadow() { vec4 sm_coord_c = texmat_3*vecPos; float shadow = texture2D(smap_3, sm_coord_c.xy).x; float s = (shadow < sm_coord_c.z) ? 0.0 : 1.0; vec4 shadow_c = vec4(1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0) * s; if(gl_FragCoord.z < vecFarbound.x) { vec4 sm_coord_c = texmat_0*vecPos; float shadow = texture2D(smap_0, sm_coord_c.xy).x; float s = (shadow < sm_coord_c.z) ? 0.0 : 1.0; shadow_c = vec4(0.7, 0.7, 1.0, 1.0) * s; } else if(gl_FragCoord.z < vecFarbound.y) { vec4 sm_coord_c = texmat_1*vecPos; float shadow = texture2D(smap_1, sm_coord_c.xy).x; float s = (shadow < sm_coord_c.z) ? 0.0 : 1.0; shadow_c = vec4(0.7, 1.0, 0.7, 1.0) * s; } else if(gl_FragCoord.z < vecFarbound.z) { vec4 sm_coord_c = texmat_2*vecPos; float shadow = texture2D(smap_2, sm_coord_c.xy).x; float s = (shadow < sm_coord_c.z) ? 0.0 : 1.0; shadow_c = vec4(1.0, 0.7, 0.7, 1.0) * s; } return shadow_c; } [/CODE] vertex shader: [CODE] varying vec3 vecLight; varying vec3 vecEye; varying vec3 vecNormal; varying vec4 vecPos; varying vec4 fragCoord; void main(void) { vecPos = gl_Vertex; vecNormal = normalize(gl_NormalMatrix * gl_Normal); vecLight = normalize(gl_LightSource[0].position.xyz); vecEye = normalize(-vecPos.xyz); gl_TexCoord[0] = gl_MultiTexCoord0; gl_Position = ftransform(); } [/CODE] And here my farbound calculation (as in the nvidia sample for csm, it prints out very similar numbers): [CODE] farBound[i] = 0.5f*(-frustumArray[i].zFar*camProj[10] + camProj[14])/frustumArray[i].zFar + 0.5f; [/CODE] Any ideas?
  5. It works fine with any other value appart from 0. That's what really bugs me about this whole problem.
  6. I see, that would make more sense to me thanks @Hodgman. @dpadam450 yes the shader is bound and getUniform returns a location. What I'm doing now is to check if dot(r,e) > 0.0 and only enter the specular part if that's true. Seems to work fine. Do you reckon that's a valid solution? Any better suggestions?
  7. Hey, thanks for your replies. I was thinking about undefined value, but what is really odd is that if I hardcode this: float spec = pow(max(0.0, dot(r, e)), 0.0) it works just fine. When I send 0.0 to the shader however, black specks everywhere. I cant explain that :S Here's my shader code: [CODE] #version 110 uniform sampler2D tex; uniform sampler2D bmap; uniform bool boolBump; uniform vec4 vecColor; uniform bool onlyColor; uniform float fTransparencyThresh; uniform float fShininess; uniform float alpha; varying vec3 vecLight; varying vec3 vecEye; varying vec3 vecNormal; vec4 getLighting() { //Ambient part vec4 color = (gl_FrontLightModelProduct.sceneColor * gl_FrontMaterial.ambient) + (gl_LightSource[0].ambient * gl_FrontMaterial.ambient); //For bump mapping, the normal comes from the bump map texture lookup vec3 n = normalize(vecNormal); if(boolBump) { n = normalize(texture2D(bmap, gl_TexCoord[0].st).xyz * 2.0 - 1.0); } vec3 l = normalize(vecLight); //Lambert term float NdotL = dot(n, l); color += gl_LightSource[0].diffuse * gl_FrontMaterial.diffuse * max(0.0, NdotL); //Reflection term if(NdotL > 0.0) { vec3 e = normalize(vecEye); vec3 r = normalize(-reflect(l,n)); float spec = pow(max(0.0, dot(r, e)), fShininess); color += gl_LightSource[0].specular * gl_FrontMaterial.specular * spec; } return color; } void main(void) { vec4 texel = texture2D(tex, gl_TexCoord[0].st); if(texel.a < fTransparencyThresh) discard; //Get shading vec4 color = getLighting(); //Color only mode? if(onlyColor) { color *= vecColor; } else { color *= texel; } //Set fragment color, alpha comes from MTL file gl_FragColor = vec4(color.xyz, alpha); } [/CODE]
  8. Hey, I'm having a problem with my normal mapping on nvidia cards that I just can't seem to fix and hope you guys could help me out. Here are some pictures showing the problem, the last one shows the same scene on ATI but from a different place in the model. [url="http://i.imgur.com/unzdx.jpg"]http://i.imgur.com/unzdx.jpg[/url] [url="http://i.imgur.com/WgiIH.jpg"]http://i.imgur.com/WgiIH.jpg[/url] [url="http://i.imgur.com/A0AAZ.jpg"]http://i.imgur.com/A0AAZ.jpg[/url] ati: [url="http://i.imgur.com/5Oa5b.png"]http://i.imgur.com/5Oa5b.png[/url] (works as intended) I found out that the problem is my shininess float value that I send into the shader. If it's 0.0f it seems like the shader on nvidia thinks its undefined or some other weird value. If I hardcode 0.0 as shininess into the specular component it works just fine. Any idea how this could happen?
  9. "??? - ???? - tsutomeru" - Meaning: to strive, to make an effort [@jisho.org] http://t.co/Rtb9dlhb