• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

mattkw80

Members
  • Content count

    8
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

102 Neutral

About mattkw80

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. Not a bad idea at all. For the moment, I need to keep it really simple - but long term - that is where I will go with it.
  2. [quote name='Nypyren' timestamp='1334531363' post='4931576'] In C#, any variable with a 'reference type' (i.e. the variable's type is a class or string) could be considered 'handles'. In C#, the code inside a method can 'see':[list] [*]Variables that got passed to the method. [*]Variables that got created in the method. [*]Member variables of the class that contains the method. [*]Public Static (or "global") variables inside any class. [/list] There are several possible ways to make your two classes 'share' data:[list] [*]When you 'new' a class, you can pass data via the constructor. [*]If you have a reference to a class, you can assign to any of its public fields or public property setters. [*]If you have a reference to a class, you can call any of its public methods and pass your data as an argument (SiCrane's example). [*]You can make your data 'public static' and then any class can access it directly (try to avoid using this unless you have to). [/list] Examples: FormInventory inventory = new FormInventory(player); // Passing it via the constructor. inventory.Player = player; // Using a field/property setter. inventory.SetPlayer(player); // Passing it to a method. var player = Form1.Player; // Accessing it via a global (public static) field/property. (This code would be written in FormInventory's methods) [/quote] I think my big problem is - VB.NET let me get away with alot of bad tricks to make this work. C# seems to be pretty strict - OOP or nothing. It's going to take me a while to re-learn the proper way.
  3. Thanks for all the reply's, I'll read these through and make sure I understand. And yeah... the Inventory needs to see the player's inventory, so it can display the player's inventory. I've done the inventory this way.... player.hasSword = true player.hasShield = false player.qtyFood = 5 player.gold = 5 (The inventory item's are variables in the player class - for simplicity sake)
  4. Sorry guys, thought the Beginners section might have been the place to post this. I'll know for next time. Thanks for the advice... Zael nailed it I think.... "[color=#282828][font=helvetica, arial, verdana, tahoma, sans-serif][size=3][left][background=rgb(250, 251, 252)]separate this logic from the game code (SQL, XML, Lua, somthing)"[/background][/left][/size][/font][/color]
  5. I've never heard of handles, maybe this is why I'm having trouble doing this. I will try to to figure this out, thanks SiCrane.
  6. I'm having trouble understanding OOP in general, but specifically in C#. If I have a player object created on my main form... (Form1), how do I talk to that same player object in another form? ie: FormInventory. Hopefully I've worded all that ok.
  7. Should I condense this- and try to ask again? Did I over complicated what I'm asking?
  8. Hey Everybody, First post, love the site/forum so far. I've been working on a RPG / Interactive Fiction game for a few years now - mostly to teach myself programming. I've got it working in VB.NET, and now I am porting it to C# (So I can learn C#). The problem is - though it works in VB.NET - I'm sure I was not doing it right. It's a complex thing to try to explain, as I'm trying to build what seems like 'AI' in to the NPC's, something like you would see in Skyrim.... but here goes... My game is basically a 2D first person, simply RPG. The problem I am having getting my head around, is the NPC's. In the VB.NET version, I was able to make it work, by creating a single NPC class, assigning it variables and methods, and then - when a situation was too much to be put in the class method, I was linking to a Method which would handle anything else an NPC could do. ie: If an NPC was named "batman", for example, I could easily have batman.eat() , batman.sleep(), batman.die(), etc. Where is got complicated - was when I need batman specifically do something no other NPC could do. (And my game has 50+ NPC's). ie: I want Batman to ask The_Joker "What do you know about the Riddler?". The reason this is complicated is, I want to give many options of dialog based on the state of the game... so... for example.... (I handled all the conditions based on hardcoded IF statements, in the game - which, is probably the wrong way to do it). 'Batman Method If command = "What do you know about the Riddler?" then [color=#008000]'The joker won't talk about this at all, if you haven't previously completed Quest#002[/color] If quest002.completed = false then Messagebox.Show("I don't know what you are talking about") : Exit Sub [color=#008000]'The Riddler object had actually died earlier in the game / Joker heals a point, as time has passed[/color] If Riddler.dead = true then Messagebox.Show("What? Didn't you hear? He died!") : Joker.Health += 1 : Exit Sub [color=#008000]'He has already told you that / your actually making him angry for having asked again[/color] If Riddler.locationKnown = true then Messagebox.Show("I already told you that - why are you asking me again?") : Joker.Mood -= 5 : Exit Sub [color=#008000]'The joker is too healthy, he won't talk / and actually heals a point now that time has passed[/color] If Joker.Health >= 80 then Messagebox.Show("I don't have to answer that") : Joker.Health += 1 : Exit Sub [color=#008000]'The Joker is hurt enough, that he will talk / and the Riddler object set's it locationknown bool to true[/color] If Joker.Health <= 30 then Messagebox.Show("Ok, don't hurt me anymore, I'll tell you where he is!") : Riddler.locationKnown = true : Exit Sub [color=#008000]'This is what would happen if no other conditions above worked[/color] Messagebox.Show("This isn't a good time to do that") : Exit Sub End If So basically... (I hope that's not too confusing)... the way I've done it... a result of a command, has 3 parts: A condition A Message (Or dialog) And things that get changed at the end..... Joker.Health += 1 , etc. I have a feeling I am doing this wrong, and maybe I'm asking too much, to be trying to create a system in which any object in the game (a location, an NPC, the player, a quest, etc) can affect any other object in the game by referencing it. Would anyone care to give this some thought, and tell me if I am doing this wrong? Or tell me how I can do this better? This stuff is all currently hardcoded into methods. (Thousand's of lines). It kind of sucks every time I setup a new line of code, because I have to consider the current state of anything relevent, and then return the results - all hand coded. I guess some of my questions are the following... 1. Is there a better way to allow each and every NPC to be able to have their own personality, without having to have a separate "MISC" method for each. 2. Should this "data" part of my game be somewhere other than typed into the game... ie: XML, SQL, etc ? Any other idea's on how I can do this better? Thanks in Advanced. Matt