treekanicko

Member
  • Content count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

102 Neutral

About treekanicko

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. "In Time" style gameplay

    Thanks for the responses guys! I've been thinking and I do like the idea, but I think it would have to implemented correctly. My main issue is thinking about how collecting time could become a mundane task. Has anyone ever played Dark Cloud? In Dark Cloud, when you go into a dungeon, you get thirsty so you have bring water with you. Whenever I see someone play this game, they always seem to get thirsty extremely fast, and they start losing what little health they have. Thus, they have to return to the surface and get more water from a shop. It gets very repetitive and boring. So, in a game where the player is always limited by time and they need to collect time to continue, it is imperative that the collection of time is an interesting task, but it can't be required so often that the player is limited by it. Just a thought. Obviously, the player would collect time in various ways, and they could collect it from people. But could they collect it from defeated enemies? My gut instinct says no because it's time and not a tangible object, but then again, most games reward players for completing tasks and defeating enemies. Even on a more extrapolated level, I don't think the player would recieve time for completing missions unless they directly have to do with the acquisition of time! This would make the player work to create ways to obtain time, and if it is a sandbox style game, there would be hundreds of ways to do this. @DrMadolite: You said that time would drive the player to create ways to obtain time, which could in turn be rewarded for archetypical behavior. I think this idea is good, but I also think that the idea may have a serious limitation. In order to create and maintain the adrenaline rush and the fear factor of death, the amount of time the player is rewarded for completing tasks would have to be very small, I think somewhere on the scale of 20 minutes or some value that would keep the player's time relatively low. Of course, the player will have spurts where he accumulates large amounts of time, maybe even years at once, but gameplay elements would force him to use it up. I can imagine what kind of fear a player would get when he doesn't quite calculate right, and buys an item at a shop and is left with only five minutes! @Acharis I totally get that, I'm mainly just throwing ideas out there right now to see others have the similar thoughts. I won't even think very hard about designing a game based on the idea of time as currency until summer (if ever).
  2. "In Time" style gameplay

    Hello all! I watched the movie [u]In Time[/u] last night and I was greatly impressed by the world and the main conflict, though I thought the movie as a movie was kind of cheesy. But then I thought: "What a cool idea for a game!" Hopefully you've seen it, but just in case you haven't, here's a quick summary of the main conflict. **Small spoiler alert** The idea is that everyone is born with a green timer on their wrist that currently has one year on it. They age until they are 25 and then the timer starts counting down, idicating how much time they have to live. Because they only have a year, they can earn time like we earn money, and in fact, time is their currency. Their jobs pay them in time, and they can transfer it between each other by interlocking their wrists. They have no limit to the amount of time they can accumulate, so they can actually live forever if they have enough time. The main conflict is that the rich can live forever and the poor die young. I just think this idea is really cool, and could be implemented well in a game! I personally was thinking something of a third person rpg, but can see it being part of a Mirror's Edge style world, or maybe even Deus Ex. The timer would always be on the screen and the player would have to keep accumulating time by various means which he or she would then spend on items, finishing mission, etc. I could see this idea implemented in a lot of different ways, and I'm wondering if anyone else thinks the same!