• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

DDoS

Members
  • Content count

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

312 Neutral

About DDoS

  • Rank
    Member
  1. i'd suggest to transform the points first by the view*model matrix, then make dot product of the point (normalized) with the view direction, probably (0,0,-1) to your solution: float k = dot(diff, vec3(-1.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f)); gives you: k = |diff| * cos(angle_between_vectors) so this is actually a projection and not the angle you want, to erase the impact from the length of diff normalize diff first. 
  2. Sponji is right, vec4(normal, 1.0f) actually translates your normales too, you could also pass the normal matrix as a 3x3 matrix into the shader
  3. hi, we're using physx for a small racing game. since our cars are working now we want to include a mesh for the racing track I know i can do that with a height field, but i'd prefer to import a (convex) triangle mesh. since the complete "racing level" is a concave mesh (and physx only likes convex meshes) i guess i have to split my static racing level mesh into convex meshes am i correct? how can i achieve that ?
  4. most likely you forget to bind some necessary data to the current shader, pls post your code render for debugging with glPolygonmode in wireframe, helps alot (and dont use black as background color ;D )
  5. you have to combine vertical and horizontal detectors: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sobel_operator   use Gx and Gy as described to compute vertical and horizontal gradients then combine those to the gradient G= sqrt(Gx² + Gy²) or a approximated gradient G= |Gx|+|Gy| (much faster)
  6. you could use assimp :) supports alot of 3d formats http://assimp.sourceforge.net/main_features_formats.html   as a beginner i'd recommend using non interleaved buffers, because you can get into troubles with offsets those are my achievements from the last 2 weeks with learning opengl :)  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgV96Ox8Cgg
  7. according to your first code you want "perspective", means you need a perspective transformation, which is not an affine transformation, so you have to use homogenous coordinates you should setup a basic rendering pipeline to transform you vertices (lineendpoints) to screenspace   vertex position -> view transformation (if you want a moving camera) -> perspective transformation -> homogenize your coordinates -> rasterize your graphics
  8. for collision and transforming 3d stuff i'd recommend linear algebra lessons ^.^ to get started don't use opengl or directx stuff, it's just frustrating, use (if you want to learn about 3d graphics) a rendering engine like ogre3d(c++) or jmonkeyengine(java) pick something that supports a programming language you already mastered. i don't recommend using udk or unity because in my opinion those engine abstract the whole "3d world" thingy to a pretty high level, which would result in learning how to use a particular game engine and not learning about 3d graphics   ogre and jmonkey abstract this also, but to an intermediate level, where you don't have to deal with opengl/directx and displaying single triangles in the beginning, you can start off learning how to use a scenegraph and stuff to display and transform objects in 3d space   well that's how a began graphics programming in school ^.^ now i study media informatics at technical university in vienna and learn about all the details behind the scenes, like programming opengl and mathematics
  9. It's totally possible, but too complicated to be useful http://callumhay.blogspot.co.at/2010/10/decomposing-affine-transforms.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QR_decomposition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_decomposition   where would you use this ?
  10. use the scanline algorithm, it's alot faster than filling every triangle
  11. yes this is correct, since dot product is distributive you can write t = dot(a-e.n) / dot(d,n) ddos edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line-plane_intersection -> Algebraic form
  12. hi, i'm working on an exercise for university and we are implementing a software renderer in java. they want us to implement some cool stuff we want, and to play around with it i thought about implementing silhouette refinement (just because i think it's interresting), saw this here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=nMwk2Zi0c3o#t=39s how would you implement this method? i googled around and found this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJfSwJLyWsU using some kind of adaptive tessaltion on the silhouette tris/edges thought about implementing an own rasterizer and use polynomial curves instead of straight lines on the outer edges, could this work ^^? pls throw in your ideas, and give me stuff to melt my brain with kind regards, DDoS
  13. [quote name='RGBA++' timestamp='1355264005' post='5009560'] trololol? [/quote] ....olololololololoooooo xD
  14. i think brute force is not the fastest method possible, but it's the easiest to implement. how are you storing your data? an adaption of a text search algorithm like boyer moore could be faster, also clustering the 0,1 into integers, and compare at integer level would be alot faster if you need all matches of the pattern i'd use 2d convolution on the input data, with the pattern as filter kernel. if your data is really really huge you can also speed up the convolution by fourier transform...