Jump to content
  • Advertisement

cvbeginner

Member
  • Content Count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

110 Neutral

About cvbeginner

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. Okay guys, so I added on the histogram approach to my algorithm. Now I have 3 values: 1. Original edge detection ==> f1 ranges between (0, 1.0) with 0 as surely unmarked 2. Original color detection ==> f2 ranges between (0, 1.0) with 0 as surely unmarked 3. Histogram ==> f3 ranges between (-0.1, 0.6) with -0.1 as surely unmarked However, now I am not sure how to combine these 3 features to give a proper result. The thing is that these numbers vary depending on bubbles from different shadow conditions, etc. Below are values for one batch of bubbles, with each feature run on each type of bubble. ----f1 marked---- 0.921717,0.927318,0.941889,0.951777,0.849224,0.921182,0.937046,0.935162,0.928395,0.931874,0.895884,0.924812,0.922886,0.94359,0.960976,0.966102,0.936893,0.938575,0.968059,0.967254 ----f1 unmarked--- 0.513648,0.569007,0.520885,0.536946,0.588808,0.503563,0.485366,0.648438,0.634761,0.569682,0.604423,0.588808,0.534146,0.569378,0.570048,0.549751,0.572115,0.558537,0.533181,0.526316,0.536058,0.506757,0.507353,0.541262,0.495146,0.52657,0.501134,0.515892,0.545232,0.569588,0.495169,0.542998,0.516908,0.521951,0.53317,0.517073,0.5,0.504464,0.540865,0.577017,0.517073,0.538462,0.548387,0.588378,0.527094,0.495074,0.597531,0.589372,0.482014,0.513382,0.608076,0.502451,0.495169,0.496471,0.55198,0.528986,0.527981,0.540416,0.520782,0.556901 ---f2 marked--- 0.945846,0.887927,0.88152,0.804752,0.805723,0.821429,0.861115,0.896657,0.902101,0.88456,0.803749,0.836843,0.5552,0.754623,0.776957,0.973357,0.841618,0.859666,0.812802 ---f2 unmarked--- 0.171143,0.215157,0.188285,0.2157,0.204242,0.212565,0.193557,0.290459,0.170951,0.204252,0.272775,0.213372,0.225717,0.237029,0.202535,0.209917,0.261719,0.209235,0.20551,0.239533,0.249532,0.311185,0.173297,0.225331,0.183087,0.218236,0.141757,0.20633,0.229702,0.27018,0.20081,0.192302,0.212325,0.181655,0.235924,0.270537,0.181245,0.398543,0.203088,0.465899,0.213208,0.197326,0.210956,0.155082,0.194379,0.172727,0.1539,0.218518,0.195955,0.151265,0.181007,0.184102,0.192148,0.191495,0.191056,0.207912,0.175489,0.19905,0.18018,0.158215,0.190958 ---f3 marked--- 0.769231,0.666667,0.679487,0.679487,0.6,0.530864,0.530864,0.682927,0.536585,0.634146,0.536585,0.634146,0.5125,0.443038,0.5125,0.594937,0.679487,0.564103,0.545455,0.631579 ---f3 unmarked--- -0.0512821,-0.0512821,-0.0512821,-0.153846,-0.141026,-0.153846,-0.0512821,-0.0897436,-0.141026,-0.126582,-0.141026,-0.227848,-0.0875,-0.0875,-0.1875,-0.0617284,-0.0617284,-0.0740741,-0.111111,-0.0617284,-0.0617284,-0.0487805,-0.0487805,-0.0487805,-0.146341,-0.146341,-0.0487805,-0.146341,-0.0487805,-0.097561,-0.146341,-0.0487805,-0.097561,-0.0740741,-0.146341,-0.097561,-0.111111,-0.0617284,-0.0617284,-0.0740741,-0.0740741,-0.0246914,-0.141026,-0.1,-0.0875,-0.0512821,-0.141026,-0.126582,-0.0512821,-0.153846,-0.141026,-0.0512821,-0.0512821,-0.153846,-0.0649351,-0.0512821,-0.102564,-0.0649351,-0.0649351,-0.0649351 I know you mentioned something about linear regression trotline; could you explain it a little bit to me if possible? It's a big number crunching problem now... Thanks for all your help so far!
  2. Wow, thanks for your ideas trotlinebeercan and jameszhao00! The OpenCV algorithm you proposed seems really interesting, but I don't want to use any external libraries. I am going to try out the bucket algorithm you proposed james and post back what I come up with.
  3. Thanks for the response. I've labeled the data in the original post. Yeah, the bubbles were printed on a lot of forms marked by people and were read by a webcam in grayscale.
  4. Marked just means the bubble is at least, let's say, 75% filled in. I'm kind of looking for an algorithm that returns a percentage chance filled, so I can have a certain threshold value (say 50%) above which it says marked, otherwise unmarked. Also, check out the sample images I posted.
  5. Hello everyone! This is my first time using the forum, so please forgive me for any mistakes I might make! Over the past few months, I have been working on an algorithm with these specifications: input: image of a bubble and some buffer space around it (in 8bpp grayscale) output: true if the bubble is marked, false otherwise false: [sharedmedia=core:attachments:9038][sharedmedia=core:attachments:9036][sharedmedia=core:attachments:9035] true: [sharedmedia=core:attachments:9033][sharedmedia=core:attachments:9034][sharedmedia=core:attachments:9032] also true: [sharedmedia=core:attachments:9037] I have tried a lot of different methods, such as: [font=arial]1. Color method: taking the average darkness of the region surrounding the bubble ([font=courier new,courier,monospace]surDarkAvg[/font]) and the darkness of the entire region ([font=courier new,courier,monospace]darkAvg[/font]). The darker [font=courier new, monospace]darkAvg [/font][font=Helvetica Neue, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif]is than [font=courier new,courier,monospace]surDarkAvg[/font], the higher change of being marked.[/font][/font] 2. Edge detection: detecting the edges (= contiguous black pixels) of the bubble and noting that the farther apart edges are, the more likely the bubble is not filled However, these methods yield widely varying results on darker bubbles and ones with different resolutions, so aren't accurate. I have spent a lot of time on this, so I wanted to ask you for your thoughts. Also, there are complications like some bubbles being marked messily, where edge detection is not as accurate. Thanks in advance!
  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!