• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.

Loon8

Members
  • Content count

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

117 Neutral

About Loon8

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. As a general rule "people" seem to say you want to minimize the number of render state changes and draw calls, but how agreessive should someone be about this? For example you have lots of meshes each with multiple materials you could 1 -have each mesh build it's own vertex/index buffers for each material. Sort by material and then issue one draw command per mesh-section. 2- Have each mesh stores it's own vertex/index buffer in main memory Sort by material Dynamically build a vertex/index buffer on the GPU for all relevant mesh-sections Issue a draw call Both cases minimize the number of render state changes The second case also minimizes the number of draw calls, but at the cost of the CPU constantly regenerating the vertex buffer each frame. Not reasonable to assume you could reuse the vertex buffer much from frame to frame as the specific meshes in view will change Yes frame coherence will generally keep the same meshes around. But again, to detect that case you are spending CPU time working out if the vertex buffer can be reused in whole or in part. I recognize the specifics will vary. But "in general" is it a best practice to dynamically create vertex/index buffer each frame, or is the cost of doing it each frame not worth the potential gain?