• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

117 Neutral

About Orgogok

  • Rank
  1. If your setting allows it you can make the range of weapons an issue. That would decrease the necessity of cover depending on the enemies setup. It also provides more variety to play styles as players can go high risk high reward or play it safe from far away.   A unit can have its own cover (to a specific direction), for example a tank or riot shield guy. Players would need to take into account facing direction and action cost for maneuvers. Expanding from that idea you can have certain units which provide cover or defensive bonuses to teammates. This would be for example some kind of energy shield in various shapes and colours. It would also increase the synergy between the team members.   The alternative to cover would be having some kind of unit who just can take a lot of damage. If your units are puny humans that probably is scifi/fantasy material, though.
  2. great point! Then lets not say "unit types for certain tasks". Its more of unit types with simple but unique abilities (the puzzle pieces). But i find it important to not make them only here a little faster and there a little heavier hitting.
  3. Your concept seems to add up nicely. When doing micro management in small steps, you need to remember that this way you cannot let a player control many units at the same time. What sunandshadow suggested was a 1:1 relation of movement squares and action points. Units have each a different amount of action points, which represents their agility. Attacks all differ in cost. (PoxNora) You dont need to have multiple actions for multiple attacks, btw. In Battle for Wesnoth a unit hits several times in one attack, (rolling for each attack separately).     Also, i want to point out that combat roles imho are..  a lot of fun. It is important that you have unit types specialized for certain tasks (classes), which the players can easily identify from the visuals. It adds flavor and tactical depth. Id research a little in that area.     PS: i hope i do not appear to be mansplaining, im actually an amateur, too
  4. warmth - Mana regen bonus (Diablo 2) Fire = Speed: Movement speed bonus with fire trail ghost fire! combine a fiery inferno suicide with a phoenix-like resurrection ability Fire has probably a lot of different meanings in other cultures which might inspire you to some cool non-destructive abilities.
  5.   Hey, Can you clarify how the combat/turns works? As you have a "defensive" move, does your game resolve the turns of each player at the same time?? (frozen synapse) Then your resource currency is time (ms?), which works not very differently to sunandshadows suggestion. I also work on a concept for a turn-based MP and i came to the conclusion to use two fixed actions per turn, too. Managing multiple units as a team should be as intuitive as possible without the player having to calculate much. It also depends on the scale of possibilities for the player. Having only a party of 4 can have a more detailed, complicated system while if the player has a lot of other stuff to do you should dumb it down a little. BTW: the new XCOM works great with only 1 or 2 actions per unit. It is a shooter, though, and you seem to focus on melee.