Jump to content
  • Advertisement

Puggyboy

Member
  • Content Count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

103 Neutral

About Puggyboy

  • Rank
    Newbie
  1. Puggyboy

    Best engine for cinematics?

        I've mentally put VRay in the same category as Redshift/Octane/Fabric etc, i.e. fast raytracers/pathtracers, but not interactive in the sense that a game engine can be. These are definitely interesting options though :)
  2. Puggyboy

    Best engine for cinematics?

      yeah, that's a good idea - Unreal removed tile rendering in UE4, but it should be easy to add back in. Thanks for the suggestion.      Well that's why I was curious about other engines. e.g. Source2 apparently being Forward+. What I'm not sure about, is how much benefit that's actually going to give me though...     Yes, TressFX is on my radar. I've got a build of UE4 with nVidia HairWorks, which is obviously a work in progress as there are loads of artefacts, but yes, it would make sense to hire a dev! 
  3. Puggyboy

    Best engine for cinematics?

      Ah yes - I'd forgotten about Cinebox... seem to remember we did contact them without response, but that's a good reminder, I'll try them again. 
  4. Puggyboy

    Best engine for cinematics?

      thanks for the reply :)   Basically, it's all down to time (and money). We currently use Houdini and Mantra to render, which takes huge amounts of time on a dedicated render farm. A significant part of the project costs is down to this, plus it's much faster to iterate in a real-time engine. For some types of project, we don't really need the full raytraced solution anyway. 
  5. Hi,    apologies if this has been discussed before, but my company (animation studio) is currently investigating engines as a possibly alternative to raytracers for making movies. So far, I've concentrated on UE4, which I've found to be a very impressive tool. We actually delivered a short trailer made in Unreal recently, which shows how easy to use it is!   However, we are running into issues, and I want to understand how many of those are fundamental to Unreal, and whether we might be better off with Unity or CryEngine (or even Source2). I'm guessing that some of these are a consequence of UE4 being a (mainly) deferred renderer, but I don't really know. I'm pretty much a beginner with DirectX, so I'm currently a bit limited in my ability to hack any engine. Our issues include:     antialiasing - generally terrible, and I'm now rendering at enormous resolutions and downsampling.  transparent/translucent materials - having many problems with things like glass and water, due to the need for transparency and specular reflections.  related to both of the above, rendering of hair/fur is terrible. motion blur and depth of field pretty low quality, although I think these have recently improved.   inability to have a selected light only affect selected meshes - we use this all the time to tweak certain shots.    On the render output side (i.e. Matinee): no 16-bit or higher outputs.  no ability to render separate layers (e.g. foreground only, background only, effects only etc).  I'm guessing that these two could be addressed relatively easily though.      My question is: is it worth moving to another engine? Or would it be easier to extend Unreal?    Any thoughts gratefully received!  
  • Advertisement
×

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

GameDev.net is your game development community. Create an account for your GameDev Portfolio and participate in the largest developer community in the games industry.

Sign me up!