Jump to content
  • Advertisement


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

198 Neutral

About JoshCzoski

  • Rank

Personal Information

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hey that's nice and catchy! I really like this one - I think it fits the character of the scene well (goes with the visuals).
  2. Yes it does sound really shrill to me. I'm afraid I'll have to look into how to do the things you mentioned though (I'll have to get around to it - busy time with the day job at the moment). D: But thanks for giving me a lead on how to improve the sound! Yeah imo virtual instruments are mostly pretty bad for anything solo Yes I've contributed violin to other projects in the past and that can be a fun gig! Thanks!
  3. So I got all excited about participating in the Final Fantasy 30th anniversary tribute and put this arrangement together, and I used my new equipment (Steinberg recording pack) for integrating my violin into it. I didn't do much of anything to it. I had a mic stand and the mic positioned right at the f-holes, recorded into Audacity, which just put it into the left channel. So I just duplicated the track and swapped the channel so that the recording could be heard in both ears. Obviously it's going through convolution reverb. The recording quality leaves quite a bit to be desired, to me, but tell me what you think or suggestions on how this could improve (i.e. from a technical standpoint), or whatever other sort of feedback. It's obviously a budget setup, but I wonder how well this would be received in the industry. Thanks!
  4. JoshCzoski

    Adequate recording equipment for the business

    I went ahead and got the recording pack I got it in the mail today and was just starting to play around with the thing. More stuff to learn. Thanks for the tips!
  5. JoshCzoski

    Adequate recording equipment for the business

    Thanks a lot, again. I was in a small-ish, office kind of room (at a friend's house, as I only had a USB mic). I thought I was rather close to the mic as I certainly understand that the sound comes out of the f-holes. Thankfully in my new apartment, my "office" area is actually on one side of a living room, so in any case I have a bigger available area when I get a new mic. I was using Audacity to record that. I'm not sure how you understood the sound coming from the left speaker, as you're right of course that it's just one mic and the recording was originally mono, but then just duplicated so it comes out of both channels (I'm a n00b here, so that's all I can think of saying).
  6. JoshCzoski

    Adequate recording equipment for the business

    Thanks a lot for your input. I kind of suspected the thought that sound equipment has come a long way and the cheaper equipment can get impressive results. I recently used a friend's condenser mic to make a recording that I stuck into a composition. I didn't think to include this in my original post (silly oversight), but basically this is a setup that's from (I want to say) PreSonus Studio 1, i.e. more or less the same price range as that recording pack. It's not bad, but I feel like it leaves a little something to be desired, possibly (speaking as someone who is not any kind of expert in recording). It sounds a little shrill and tinny, like it could feel more full. It's not horrible, but has room for improvement. Do you think I could trouble y'all for input on this upload to that end? JoshRecordingHigherBest.mp3
  7. I had my eye on Steinberg's recording pack for a while now, as I am very interested in the prospects of contributing clips of my violin playing to compositions (my own or others') in the business. I contributed to a fan album called "Spectrum of Mana" years back, which they liked a lot, and amazingly I'd done it with a USB mic (MXL .007). But, I'm aware that a USB mic doesn't cut it and you need some kind of condenser to an external audio interface. I was looking at Steinberg's recording pack: https://www.amazon.com/Steinberg-UR22-MKII-RP-Headphones/dp/B01MSN3RUP/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1507487287&sr=8-1&keywords=steinberg+recording+pack I was recently playing the recent re-skin of "Wonder Boy: the Dragon's Trap" which has a lot of that in it: various professional instrumentalists individually contributing recordings to its soundtrack. Of course Steinberg's recording pack is something of a budget item and so if necessary (though of course I like to save money however possible), I might be able to look into something better a little bit down the road. What's the general price range of something that can truly cut it if a paying game designer is looking for some recording clips? I recently used a friends (inexpensive) setup to contribute recordings to one of my own compositions and it sounds good, but I think there may be a bit of room for improvement in it (posting the track sometime might help for getting feedback on the issue sometime) as far as recording quality. Thanks!
  8. JoshCzoski

    Original composition - five hours' work

    So, when I've been working with midi controls, the "expression" layer, or cc11, seems to be the most direct control on the volume. I did see a main volume control at cc7 but it didn't do anything when I've tried it. So when you're talking abotu "volume automation" I might not be familiar with what that is. After googling this briefly it looks like I just have some learning to do with DAW software, so that gives me something to look into. Thanks!
  9. JoshCzoski

    Original composition - five hours' work

    Hey Nate, Thanks for your input and those are some great ideas. I'm not sure I understand the #3 comment (just from a technical standpoint) about doubling a "synth layer." (my technical lingo may be lacking here) Does that mean something like simply duplicating an instrument? For the dynamics in general, the oboe is generally a single dynamic marking and the volume changes are really subtle (the midi line for volume looks like small ripples if that makes the picture), so maybe you're saying the that might still get more pronounced? For the strings - volume-wise - there's a bit more dynamic contrast and they're identical in shape except the double-bass is toned down quite a bit from the others, so it sounds like you'd rather hear more double-bass to avoid the top-heaviness - just my interpretation. One question I have for you, if I may, is in the interest of my understanding timeframes of work, how does five hours sound for coming up with this sort of work? I mean, just for what it is and the kinds of work/micromanaging I did with this track at this point. Thanks again. And the input has been valuable and appreciated. Josh
  10. So in my efforts to see if I can produce something speedily, I spent about five hours this afternoon working on this piece from scratch. It's about 53 seconds and loops once in this track (to demonstrate that it loops seamlessly). It's a slow piece (obviously) that uses a grand total of 9 instrument patches, which is a really low number compared to the last one I posted here (the "Adventure Theme" had some 70+). The solo oboe has 3, with a harp, and one for each string section. I think about 3 hours were spent on the composition itself altogether. I did a LOT of micromanaging the modulation (cc1) and expression midi controls on all the parts, but since the strings are all together, I only needed to do that once for the section, and then a lot of work on those controls and velocities on the oboe part. Beyond that are details like balancing and timing (string patches can be wonky with timing). How does that sound? I think of a track like this looping during a tragic scene in a game. I imagined the venerable Yasunori Mitsuda's somber piece "Tears of the Stars Hearts of the People" in Xenogears and this track serving a similar purpose.
  11. Nate: Wonderful, thank you so much! I feel like I may have very nearly as much in the way of tips to feel confident for getting started. (I was just remembering a tip you made earlier about putting a "watermark" over a track). Your methods sound very reasonable to me. I kind of envisioned doing something like that, like getting a feel for what a client wants and then coming up with a price per project. I had noticed on your YouTube page that you were doing music and overall sound design for some anime trailers. I appreciate that last example also - looks like a great package, and it's making me consider doing some personal exercises like give myself a limited amount of time to come up with something for that sort of need. I've seen some composers write their work over existing movies as demonstrations too. Thanks for the compliment! At the moment I'm a bit in a playground with composing, with very very limited experience writing for occasions so far, so your work on the trailer is also particularly interesting to me - no sound design experience beyond music, however. Cheers, Josh
  12. nsmadsen, Ah perfect, thank you! That's very very helpful information! (just the kind I was looking for) And thanks for sharing those tracks. It's making me think that I may need to work on getting a BIT faster but it seems in the realm of doable - a lot of my slowness comes from running into technical problems working with the DAW, as well as some general inexperience with it (trying to figure out exactly what's bugging me about something in my composition). Right now I'm in a very big project in large part for my learning/practices. Since we're on the same page about that, is it possible that I could ask for your thoughts about how to do rates? I mean, maybe I should first concern myself with making sure I have a stable workflow and making a portfolio, but if I were to jump in, I do wonder what would be reasonable to charge by hour of work or minute of music from my current position. I haven't worked with a client in this field before (just did a little music at a start-up very briefly). Thanks again!
  13. Oh, to further clarify, I might get an answer like "well you may have to prioritize if you're under the gun with your arrangements" and "sometimes you might run out of time for micromanaging velocities and some midi controls as that takes extra time," OR, you just plain have to practice and get faster if you're not able to do a work like that faster than "x" amount of time when the situation truly calls for it. These are just thoughts that I toss around. You mentioned a deadline of 3-4 hours, for example. I couldn't write the theme I posted here in that short amount of time - not even close to being able to do that, but I can write what I personally find to be less complicated approaches in timeframes like that (just depending on what it is or needs to be). So, the practicality of writing music certain ways and/or just working on my speed is what I'm considering. Thanks!
  14. Yikes I think you completely misunderstood what I was saying, and I really hope you might my reconsider your interpretation, though I also hope you'll pardon me for the way I came across. I can't understate how much I COMPLETELY agree with what you're saying about games either having very wonderfully-done virtual orchestras OR other styles like chiptunes or any other electronic sounds all across the spectrum OR just generally more basic orchestral sounds than something like EWQL and they are all valid. Also, I'm a HUGE fan of game music that is not at all orchestral, from 8-bit to 16-bit and I absolutely love the styles as well as how they compliment the games they go with - can't understate my lifelong enthusiasm for that, so I think that was very misunderstood. I often listen to SNES Knights of the Round while working lately; somehow I just love it and find that one a bit underrated and forgotten. The only thing I seem to be having a very, very hard time conveying when I'm asking questions about timeframe is that I find it rather inescapable that some kinds of work takes a lot longer than others to do - I have simply had a very, very hard time getting answers for it. I've written pretty quick works that I'll totally stand behind - as well as works of others too, as I hope goes without saying - that I would consider (and see no harm or offense in saying) were a lot simpler to put together and therefore MUCH faster to get ready than - for example - the musical piece that I put up. So part of my question - if you'll excuse me for repeating myself - is, what's considered reasonable for putting together something like what I posted here? It was not quick for me. And definitely not as quick as some of my own works that I'd consider "simpler" to put together - however it's considered proper (and not "rude") for me to put it, a work like the one I posted definitely has a lot more to it and (for me) therefore takes more time to complete. So I'm considering, how concerned should I be about trying to get "faster" at it and weigh the need for considering timing - a real concern. Or maybe I need a different approach, etc. The point of my question had to do with my competence for getting something ready in a reasonable timeframe. I'm actually still rather new to composing with all of the features between VSTS and just DAWs in general and I still struggle for getting used to it. I mean no disrespect. Thank you for the answers you gave, though. I hope that clarifies my intentions a bit better as I seem to struggle to successfully ask clearly what I thought to be a very important question without coming across as rude (apparently not succeeding in both counts) in some way, so maybe you can help me with that if I managed to make myself clear this time. Does my question make better sense? Again, please pardon me as I've struggled to get an answer. I suppose what I should have done is go on the EWQL forums as they work with this exact software all the time, but I thought I should ask people who are actually in the business.
  15. Very interesting ambient stuff. I really like Electro-orchestral Trailer, maybe the most. I think my instinct, even for a background-ish, ambient track might be just to do even more creative experimenting even more with sounds you have. Like in Electro-orchestral trailer, introducing the choir and the strings at certain points were great and very appropriately understated, for evoking mood. I might consider tightening the dynamic range on that track, as that might make it more (appropriately) unobtrusive to a gaming experience. Very nice. I can see this work complimenting the right kind of game nicely.
  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!