Jump to content
  • Advertisement


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

501 Good

About Numsgil

  • Rank
  1. Numsgil

    Separate DirectCompute context?

    Thanks MJP, that sounds doable and sounds like it'd give me what I want.   @Jason - The simulation scales with O(n^3) at the moment, though I'm hoping to get that down to O(n^2), for some definition of N :)  I can break up the tasks well enough to avoid the Windows' watchdog restarting the driver, but trying to timeslice it with rendering tasks would be a huge pain.  If N is small, I can run dozens of complete simulation cycles per render frame (think of something like Simcity in fast forward).  And if N is large, it can take dozens of render frames for each simulation frame.  Decoupling the two seems fairly obvious, though you're right, I've never heard of anyone trying to do this.
  2. Numsgil

    Separate DirectCompute context?

    To be clear, there's an obvious way to get this working: build two separate processes that communicate with each other over TCP/IP.  Each could have their own DirectX context, and the sim process could run at whatever framerate it wanted, and the rendering process could do its best to run at 60 FPS and grab updates from the sim process periodically.  But that's a super heavy handed way to approach the problem, and I'm wondering if there's a better way.
  3. Numsgil

    Separate DirectCompute context?

    I wasn't necessarily talking about deferred contexts.  Deferred contexts seem like just a way to gather up commands from multiple threads.  I was talking more about the possibility of creating two different immediate contexts.  I noticed that when you have two different games running at the same time, for instance, they both get time on the GPU without the games needing to communicate.  And that long DirectCompute tasks (like several seconds long), won't freeze the system like I've seen long OpenCL tasks do.  But they do seem to freeze the executing program.
  4. Is it possible/kosher to create multiple device contexts in DirectX 11 with the purpose of using one for rendering and one for GPGPU?   Basically I'm working on a something sort of like a sim game.  I want a render thread running as close to 60 FPS as possible, but I also want to offload a lot of the sim calculations to DirectCompute, and run it as fast as possible.  That means the sim thread can run anywhere from 1 to 1000 FPS, depending on what's going on.  The sim also needs to push data to the render thread eventually, but I don't necessarily mind that going out through the North Bridge to the CPU and back to the GPU (I don't mind a bit of latency from the sim to the renderer, as long as things stay responsive to the user).
  5. @clb: I don't think you can do h' = |M*H| because M*H is not guaranteed to be a shortest path between the two parallel lines after they're transformed by M.   That is, just because H is perpendicular to both lines before transformation doesn't mean it's perpendicular to both lines after transformation.  Consider the case of a sheering of a square in to a parallelogram.  One of those funny properties of affine transformations: closest point pairs on parallel lines aren't preserved.
  6. Affine transformation is just another name for a matrix with non uniform scale, rotation, and translation baked in (more or less).  I didn't mean to be too obtuse when forming the question :)   Anyway, I came up with: h' = h * length(S*(b - a)) / (length(b - a)) after a bit of algebra.  Can someone confirm/refute that?  I took the method I described and worked it out algebraically.  But intuitively I'm surprised I'm using b-a and not a vector perpindicular to b-a or something along those lines.
  7. I have a line (with points A, B on the line), and a distance 'h' to a parallel line.  Under an affine transformation, the lines should stay parallel, but the distance between them might change.  How can I get the new distance between the lines?   My thinking right now is to construct a point on the red line, transform that point with the affine transformation, and then find the distance of that new point to the transformed black line AB.  But is there a more direct way to calculate the new distance?
  • Advertisement

Important Information

By using GameDev.net, you agree to our community Guidelines, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.

We are the game development community.

Whether you are an indie, hobbyist, AAA developer, or just trying to learn, GameDev.net is the place for you to learn, share, and connect with the games industry. Learn more About Us or sign up!

Sign me up!