Jump to content

View more

Image of the Day

Boxes as reward for our ranking mode. ヾ(☆▽☆)
#indiedev #gamedev #gameart #screenshotsaturday https://t.co/ALF1InmM7K
IOTD | Top Screenshots

The latest, straight to your Inbox.

Subscribe to GameDev.net Direct to receive the latest updates and exclusive content.


Sign up now

Which version of c++ is best when developing games for DirectX?

4: Adsense

Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.


  • You cannot reply to this topic
10 replies to this topic

#1 ZomeonE   Members   

122
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 29 September 1999 - 11:33 PM

Which version of C++ is the best when developing games with DirectX?

#2 NuFAN   Members   

122
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 28 September 1999 - 04:12 AM

VC++ 6 Professional / Enterprise

------------------
Skullpture Entertainment
#40842461


#3 Dave Astle   Distinguished Rhino   

2312
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 28 September 1999 - 04:48 AM

I'll second that. DirectX is very easy to use with Visual C++.

#4 ZomeonE   Members   

122
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 28 September 1999 - 05:32 AM

Ok, what is the difference between the standard and the professional / enterprise edition?

#5 NuFAN   Members   

122
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 28 September 1999 - 05:35 AM

In the standard version, you don't have code optimisation, the debugger and many useful tools.

CU

------------------
Skullpture Entertainment
#40842461


#6 Melo   Members   

122
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 28 September 1999 - 07:55 AM

If the piggy bank is a little small, i would recommend WATCOM. I'm working with it and it's easy to write DX progs with it, too.
Well, but the IDE really s***s.

#7 NuFAN   Members   

122
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 28 September 1999 - 09:13 AM

Didn't they stop developing Watcom ? I heard 11.0 would have been the last version.

CU

------------------
Skullpture Entertainment
#40842461


#8 Melo   Members   

122
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 29 September 1999 - 12:50 AM

Yep, that's right, so if you don't want to pay for it, you can wait, 'cause it *might* be free in the future.
As I said, it's still a good compiler (at the moment).

#9 NuFAN   Members   

122
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 29 September 1999 - 03:57 AM

I did never say it isn't a good compiler, but Watcom's time is over, so I'd say better get VC++. I'm gonna look at Watcom if they release it for free.

CU

------------------
Skullpture Entertainment
#40842461


#10 Shinkage   Members   

595
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 29 September 1999 - 03:28 PM

I can't think of a reason he'd possibly need the Enterprise edition of VC (and have to pay the BIG bucks for it). Professional edition is really all anyone needs. It can be had around here for about $45 at the local computer show. Check http://www.marketpro.com to see if they have them anywhere near you.

#11 Niels   Members   

122
Like
Likes
Like

Posted 29 September 1999 - 11:33 PM

I can think of one reason (the only difference in fact):

Sourcesafe!

Even when working on your own, sourcesafe is an invaluable tool for version control. (And its great for localizing those re-appearing bugs you were sure you already fixed )...

/NJ






Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.