That NaN check might not work if you enable fp-fast or otherwise allow deviance from the floating point spec.
Just so you know.
[C++] Are compilers allowed to optimize ...
I'm aware of that, but I've made a habit of doing it just because it makes it impossible to write silly stuff like
is_NaN( 6.3433 ) = false;
That assignment is always impossible, no matter if you return a bool or a const bool. Again, the const is simply ignored here, it doesn't make any difference whatsoever. The language simply does not allow assigning to scalar rvalues.
Author
That assignment is always impossible, no matter if you return a bool or a const bool. Again, the const is simply ignored here, it doesn't make any difference whatsoever. The language simply does not allow assigning to scalar rvalues.
Yes, if you read my last post you'll see that I've already conceded that point. ;)
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
