We get it. We use ad blockers too. But GameDev.net displays them so we can continue to be a great platform for you.
Please whitelist GameDev.net and our advertisers.
Also consider a GDNet+ Pro subscription to remove all ads from GameDev.net.
Subscribe to GameDev.net's newsletters to receive the latest updates and exclusive content.
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.
Posted 26 March 2012 - 06:31 AM
Posted 26 March 2012 - 07:59 AM
Posted 26 March 2012 - 08:39 AM
Posted 26 March 2012 - 12:39 PM
Posted 26 March 2012 - 11:27 PM
“If I understand the standard right it is legal and safe to do this but the resulting value could be anything.”
Posted 27 March 2012 - 12:55 AM
Do you just want to solve for a1 in the last equation? If you multiply both sides of the equation by the denominator of the right-hand side and you expand, you'll get a polynomial of degree 3 in a1. That can be solved analytically or numerically."
This equation will only work for two bodies and will not be possible to expand to more, so pretty boring.
People have been working on these problems for hundreds of years, you should listen more carefully on the previous posters. Numerical is the way to go here.
Posted 27 March 2012 - 01:18 AM
Posted 27 March 2012 - 02:44 AM
Posted 27 March 2012 - 04:31 AM
You don't understand. What you are trying to solve analytically has no analytical solution. I already explained why in my previous post, I will repeat it here - these equations are nonlinear, with feedback (as you noticed with the equation-inside-an-equation pattern). Those types of equations cannot be solved by ordinary algebra. You need numerical methods to work with those.here it is, the equation for whatever number of objects:
http://imageshack.us.../685/sdfjm.png/
i cant do it...can some math expert help me with it. How can I get out of that? there must be someway already invented to solve that cycle of an equation inside the other inside the equation inside the other inside the equation inside the other......infinite.
“If I understand the standard right it is legal and safe to do this but the resulting value could be anything.”
Posted 27 March 2012 - 04:44 AM
Posted 27 March 2012 - 04:50 AM
But are you sure, I don't believe that, i have already seen similar problems before,but those are just some weak memories of mine, so the only thing i can tell is that it can be solved,I just need a real math expert to see my equation, i am pretty sure it can be solved. I want Alvaro, the man looks like an expert, Alvaro! come here an tell me...
Posted 27 March 2012 - 01:15 PM
Posted 27 March 2012 - 02:16 PM
Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.
GameDev.net™, the GameDev.net logo, and GDNet™ are trademarks of GameDev.net, LLC.