Once again I'm having fun with linear algebra...or so I think right now.
I have picking methods in my level editor that work great for my mesh objects, except when it comes to scaled meshes. I apply an inverse of the mesh's world transform matrix to get the ray from world space into object space, and rotation/translation don't give it any problems. When I scale a mesh up in size, the algorithm no longer lets the ray hit the mesh correctly, and I get a lot of null results on the collision check.
I'm assuming its because the inverse of a scale operation is going to do something wierd to the ray, as I can't grasp at the moment what it's going to do to a single point...I'm assuming scale it relative to (0,0,0) which will...wait, no, that would bring a correctly un-rotated/un-translated ray closer to the object's origin, which makes sense for a scaled up mesh relative to its base 3d coords.
Okay, I don't know then. I'm likely missing something else in the code like the last time I had a question on matrices and vector spaces. But if my guess is off, I'd be happy with any enlightenment.
inverse world matrix and per-triangle picking
Hi,
Can you show some code? I use similar method in my project and it works as intended. Before testing each mesh, I transform the pick ray by the inverse world matrix of the model and then test the meshes of the model in the model space.
Cheers!
Can you show some code? I use similar method in my project and it works as intended. Before testing each mesh, I transform the pick ray by the inverse world matrix of the model and then test the meshes of the model in the model space.
Cheers!
Here's where I actually calculate the picked prop object (static level mesh object):
And here's the method that does the per-triangle intersection calculation:
I'm going to test and see if it's the boundingsphere intersect check that's tripping things up, I didn't expect it since the bsphere is just built from a centerpoint and radius (which are calculated correctly when the mesh class is built) ...except crap, the radius field doesn't get modified when I scale the object. I might be back soon with a fix, but feel free to look this over anyway.
private Prop intersectedProp(Map map)
{
float? nearestResult = null;
Prop returnProp = null;
foreach (Prop prop in map.propList)
{
BoundingSphere bsphere = new BoundingSphere(prop.Model.Midpoint + prop.Position, prop.Model.Radius);
if (pickingRay.Intersects(ref bsphere))
{
float tempResult = perTriangleModelIntersect(prop.Model, pickingRay);
if (tempResult != 0)
{
if (nearestResult == null || tempResult < nearestResult)
{
nearestResult = tempResult;
returnProp = prop;
}
}
}
}
return returnProp;
}
And here's the method that does the per-triangle intersection calculation:
private float perTriangleModelIntersect(Mesh model, Ray ray)
{
float result = 0;
Matrix inverseWorld = Matrix.Invert(model.GetWorld());
Vector3 transRayStart = Vector3.TransformCoordinate(ray.Position, inverseWorld);
Vector3 origRayEnd = ray.Position + ray.Direction;
Vector3 transRayEnd = Vector3.TransformCoordinate(origRayEnd, inverseWorld);
Ray inverseRay = new Ray(transRayStart, transRayEnd - transRayStart);
VertexModel[] verts = model.RawVertices;
int[] indices = model.RawIndices;
for (int i = 0; i < indices.Length; )
{
float tempResult;
Vector3 v1 = verts[indices[i++]].Position;
Vector3 v2 = verts[indices[i++]].Position;
Vector3 v3 = verts[indices[i++]].Position;
inverseRay.Intersects(ref v1, ref v2, ref v3, out tempResult);
if (tempResult != 0)
{
if (result == 0)
{
result = tempResult;
}
else if (tempResult < result)
{
result = tempResult;
}
}
}
return result;
}
I'm going to test and see if it's the boundingsphere intersect check that's tripping things up, I didn't expect it since the bsphere is just built from a centerpoint and radius (which are calculated correctly when the mesh class is built) ...except crap, the radius field doesn't get modified when I scale the object. I might be back soon with a fix, but feel free to look this over anyway.
*sigh* yea, it's the boundingsphere. (if I get rid of the check, picking works pixel-perfect). And the centerpoint is not being calculated correctly, I'm horrible at conceptualizing edge cases, until I walk away from an algorithm for a few days and take another look at it, like now. Going back to the drawing board on that one.
SO, if anyone's having a similar issue and is wondering: applying an inverse of your mesh's world transform to your picking ray WILL put you in the object space of the mesh, so that's still useful.
SO, if anyone's having a similar issue and is wondering: applying an inverse of your mesh's world transform to your picking ray WILL put you in the object space of the mesh, so that's still useful.
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement