Jump to content

  • Log In with Google      Sign In   
  • Create Account

Rotate A Quad Along Axis To Face Camera

Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

  • You cannot reply to this topic
3 replies to this topic

#1   Members   


Posted 23 January 2013 - 12:49 PM

I am having some success aligning a particle to a direction and then rotating it along its axis. At the moment I am just constantly rotating it. How do I calculate the correct rotation so it always faces the camera?
Please have a look at this video: Quad Slowly Rotating Along Axis
I am using DPSF. I have modified the "FlyingSparks" demo.
To calculate the orientation Quaternion I run this code:


private void UpdateOrientation(DefaultTextureQuadTextureCoordinatesParticle cparticle, float felapsedtimeinseconds)
   var normalized = cparticle.Velocity;
   cparticle.Orientation = Quaternion.Identity;
   cparticle.Right = -normalized;
   _rotation += 0.03f;
   cparticle.Orientation = Quaternion.CreateFromAxisAngle(normalized, _rotation) * cparticle.Orientation;


After some trial and error the above code produces what you see in the video.
Line 5: resets the orientation.
Line 6: aligns the quad to the velocity direction.
Line 7: increments the rotation.
Line 8: further rotates the quad along its axis by the rotation.
What I am asking is how do I calculate the rotation?
I am not a maths expert. I can guess that I need the normal of the particle, calculated within line 6 and then use that to determine it's difference from the camera direction. I have looked at some billboarding techniques but they don't offer exactly what I want.
I am very close to finishing my game and this is the last hurdle, any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated, thank you for taking the time to look at this smile.png

#2   Members   


Posted 24 January 2013 - 11:32 AM

Basically, stop rotating it! :)

Get the transform matrix of your camera:


X = [ a b c 0 ]

Y = [ d e f 0 ]

Z = [ g h i 0 ]


The camera *looks* down Z, and the X/Y axes are left/right and up/down respectively. Given the width & height of your quad, you can compute the points directly:


P0 =  X * (width/2) + Y * (height/2)

P1 = -X * (width/2) + Y * (height/2)

P2 = -X * (width/2) - Y * (height/2)

P3 =  X * (width/2) - Y * (height/2)

#3   Members   


Posted 01 February 2013 - 01:46 PM

Thanks Rob.


I found a solution within the library, after learning some basic math.


 Orientation3D.SetUpDirection(ref cparticle.Orientation, Vector3.Cross(cparticle.Velocity, CameraPosition - cparticle.Position));


I'll try to see if I can use your method to edit the vertices directly, but it looks a little like the function it calls is doing as you suggest anyway.


        public static Quaternion GetRotationTo(Vector3 CurrentDirection, Vector3 DesiredDirection, Vector3 sFallbackAxis)
            Quaternion quaternion = new Quaternion();
            Vector3 vector = CurrentDirection;
            Vector3 vector2 = DesiredDirection;
            float num = Vector3.Dot(vector, vector2);
            if (num >= 1f)
                return Quaternion.Identity;
            if (num <= -0.999999f)
                if (sFallbackAxis != Vector3.Zero)
                    return Quaternion.CreateFromAxisAngle(sFallbackAxis, 3.141593f);
                Vector3 axis = Vector3.Cross(Vector3.UnitX, vector);
                if (axis.LengthSquared() < 0.999998f)
                    axis = Vector3.Cross(Vector3.UnitY, vector);
                return Quaternion.CreateFromAxisAngle(axis, 3.141593f);
            Vector3 vector4 = Vector3.Cross(vector, vector2);
            double num2 = Math.Sqrt((double) ((1f + num) * 2f));
            double num3 = 1.0 / num2;
            quaternion.X = (float) (vector4.X * num3);
            quaternion.Y = (float) (vector4.Y * num3);
            quaternion.Z = (float) (vector4.Z * num3);
            quaternion.W = (float) (num2 * 0.5);
            return quaternion;

#4   Members   


Posted 01 February 2013 - 01:49 PM

Your method seems way simpler :)

Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.