• Virtual Sticks and buttons occupy screen space which could be used to view the game.
• Playing with these inputs can be quite uncomfortable on the hands.
• Virtual sticks are a legacy concept from different, physical input pad platforms.
• Number of inputs is limited by the available screen space for buttons and sticks.

• Do you think virtual sticks and buttons are the best inputs for touchscreen devices such as tablets and smartphones?
• Have we overestimated the importance of non-traditional inputs for touchscreen devices?
• Should we consider adding these methods of control to the game, despite it being contrary to the design philosophy we developed along with the game?

I don't feel virtual sticks are 'best', but it can be a compromise. Some types of games just respond better with a couple of axes and buttons than to any kind of tap, tilt, or swipe, platformers in particular.

It's also difficult to be 'first.' Even if your controls were intuitively designed, sticks and pads are our default inputs. If the game looks similar to anything they've played before, you're fighting against that acclimatization. With Windows 8, the majority of complaints are along the lines of "this is drastically different" and that's made it difficult for people to adapt.

If people are holding the device incorrectly, you could try drawing more attention to the controls when they first start up, get them to change the way they think about the game. Focus the first minute on the optimal way to play and throw in some messages suggesting on how to hold it. If there's a lot of different gestures or actions, don't overwhelm them all at once, get them to use them one at a time.

It sounds like if you can break them out of the virtual-stick mentality before they get the expectation that it's the way to play, they might have a better experience.

Good posts.

I'm dealing with a somewhat similar issue now in my (early prototype) tablet game. Initially feedback has been the game has some nice potential with some polish but right now controlling the spaceship and to a slightly lesser degree weapons fire UI are really bad. My wife's comment was "the game shouldn't be as difficult as piloting an actual NASA spacecraft" lol

I'm going back to the drawing board including another take at making use of the accelerometer to various degrees as well as some of the simpler, earlier controls like thruster buttons instead of swipe.

Maybe I'm getting a bit desperate but I'm even considering the nuclear option of support 2-5 different UI's. Some players may prefer swipe, other movement by thruster buttons/controls, others by accelerometer, others firing by accelerometer etc. I tend to lean against offering a variety of UI's because it increase design/code/testing complexity, and one approach may be found superior by the hardcore players. I'd prefer to offer a single UI, but am just not sure if enough players will have a clear consensus on which of these is better. In other words, if in further testing 80% or more prefer 1 approach, I am fine going with that. But if 1/3 prefer the accelerometer, 1/3 swipe, and 1/3 traditional buttons perhaps I offer 3 choices and you can choose whatever.

I can only express my own experience playing games on the tablet.

The problem I often found with games that had no virtual sticks and buttons was that thy did not explain how to interact.

It is true that thy did have some kind of tutorial at the start of the game, but when I played one game and then another I was lost.

In one game touching the screen would fire at the point in a other it would cause the character to walk there, virtual buttons make this a lot easier.

My advice is to use similar controls to other touchscreen games, every person I know reaches for the WASD keys and mouse when playing a FPS.

Have some kind of on screen indication, even Xbox games has on screen indication when it isn't needed.

The point is that no one wants to constantly think "how do I switch weapons again?" when thy can fire a grenade with one gun and shoot it in mid air with a another.

The point is that no one wants to constantly think "how do I switch weapons again?" when thy can fire a grenade with one gun and shoot it in mid air with a another.

I think this is particularly interesting. Many of the games we see on tablets and smart phones are novel in design, and so players don't have an intuitive grasp of what controls should be there. Developing a WASD for tablets (a touch based alternative standard) seems to be trickier as there's so many different designs for the games.

Perhaps it needs to be more about messaging, like Haps mentions above. We don't really do too much in terms of showing the player how to use the inputs in our game so maybe it's our fault for improper messaging.

I ended up switching my UI pretty significantly, it still has bugs and needs a lot of tweaking but so far I'm liking it much better.

- turning left and right is via left and right rotation buttons

- velocity is controlled by a thrust lever

- aiming the angle of weapons fire is controlled via the accelerometer. It moves a crosshairs icon (current 2 green circles)

- firing the weapons/abilities is by pressed any of the 3 ability buttons

Seems like an interesting set of inputs. I like that you use a thrust leaver to controller to acceleration of the ship. I imagine that this must feel like the player is really piloting the ship.

Thanks!

One of the biggest constraints I've found when designing a tablet UI is just the natural position of people's fingers. At least the way I hold it (and I believe most people), the most natural place to touch is along the sides of the screen sort of towards the center. Any other place causes you to have to awkwardly lift your hand and position it over the screen and only then touch it.

The other thing I quickly discovered on touchscreens that I didn't expect (though very obvious in retrospect!) is just placing your finger on the screen obscures it. So that throws out the window many of the paradigms you commonly use on PC with a small mouse cursor. So at this point for example I don't have any things clickable (eg planets, starships) on the main tactical screen as it would take too much of your view away from you and interfere with combat. There will be some interactions that are less real-time dependent (pinging a location to attack or retreat) that I will allow touches for on that panel, but not much else.