• FEATURED

View more

View more

View more

### Image of the Day Submit

IOTD | Top Screenshots

### The latest, straight to your Inbox.

Subscribe to GameDev.net Direct to receive the latest updates and exclusive content.

### #9Godmil  Members

Posted 19 March 2014 - 03:14 PM

It's certainly giving an alternative to Unity Pros $75 per month. (Incidentally has everyone seen the trailer for Unity 5? Looks like some nice improvements). ### #10DareDeveloper Members Posted 20 March 2014 - 01:19 AM I thought it was interesting, too. What prevented an impulse signup is • IDE support • Lack of spare time • The kind of projects I am planning to work on • and that I could not find much information about what difference subscribing through Epic Games International S.à r.l. (residence not in the United States of America) makes. It is on my radar now, though. Given enough eyeballs, all mysteries are shallow. ### #11Godmil Members Posted 20 March 2014 - 06:33 AM I've been totally into Unity until now, but I'm going to take the leap. What sold it for me is: -There is no unique scripting language anymore, it's all C++. -It does 2D and has example projects for many different game types. -While Unity can look pretty good (mostly if you buy the expensive pro version). This is going to look pretty much as good as you can get with no features hidden behind paywalls. -Being comfortable with how this works is likely to be very useful for future employment options (though hopefully I'll never have to leave my current job). -I love the idea that I can cancel my subscription now and still have this amazing code base to learn from and play around with forever. ### #12jms bc Members Posted 20 March 2014 - 08:37 AM Very interesting and tempting -- will consider this for awhile, with peaking interest after reading comments, almost buying for several months even as interest wanes in the absence of necessity, before forgetting about it. Just got comfortable with Unity... The Four Horsemen of Happiness have left. ### #13ambershee Members Posted 20 March 2014 - 09:21 AM Note that it is$20 per user per month.  So if you have 5 developers on your team and it takes a year to build the game, that is $1200 you just paid in development tools, plus 5% of your gross revenue. The engine is certainly good, just be aware that if you are counting your money in a startup, the fees to use it can multiply quickly. If you do the math and it works out for you, wonderful. If you do the math and it doesn't work for you, there are alternatives. Either way, if you are considering Unreal for your game engine be sure you do all the math when picking a license.$1200 is the tip of the iceberg when licensing software. Let's face it, the cost of Max / Maya is astronomical in comparison. Creative Cloud will also cost you.

Just with everything there are cheaper or free alternatives, but they are not the same.

### #14Luckless  Members

Posted 20 March 2014 - 09:47 AM

Note that it is $20 per user per month. So if you have 5 developers on your team and it takes a year to build the game, that is$1200 you just paid in development tools, plus 5% of your gross revenue.

The engine is certainly good, just be aware that if you are counting your money in a startup, the fees to use it can multiply quickly. If you do the math and it works out for you, wonderful. If you do the math and it doesn't work for you, there are alternatives. Either way, if you are considering Unreal for your game engine be sure you do all the math when picking a license.

$1200 is the tip of the iceberg when licensing software. Let's face it, the cost of Max / Maya is astronomical in comparison. Creative Cloud will also cost you. Just with everything there are cheaper or free alternatives, but they are not the same. Not to mention that most programmers I know can spend more than$20 on coffee alone in a week... This is a very cost effective tool.

If your signature on a web forum takes up more space than your average post, then you are doing things wrong.

### #15ambershee  Members

Posted 20 March 2014 - 10:04 AM

Where I am, two beers can cost \$19, so I'm hardly worried, haha.

### #16Ed Welch  Members

Posted 20 March 2014 - 12:47 PM

I had a look. The mobile part of it doesn't look too good. Basically, you can't even get dynamic shadows for iPad2 device.

### #17ambershee  Members

Posted 21 March 2014 - 04:42 AM

I had a look. The mobile part of it doesn't look too good. Basically, you can't even get dynamic shadows for iPad2 device.

However, this is the very first release, aimed at early adopters. It's powerful, but not very polished, and it requires a beefy desktop computer. Rough areas include:

The 'rough areas' include both iOS and Android support.

Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.