• FEATURED

View more

View more

View more

### Image of the Day Submit

IOTD | Top Screenshots

### The latest, straight to your Inbox.

Subscribe to GameDev.net Direct to receive the latest updates and exclusive content.

# Formular to get Frumstum-Index from Vector for 2D-Cube-Mapping

Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.

### #1stefthedrummer  Members

Posted 13 April 2014 - 04:14 AM

I'm working on a formular to calculate the index for the frustum of a 2D-Point-Light.

My Light-System is rendering the Scene into 4 1D-Textures: Right, Left, Top and Bottom.

Now, in the fragment shader I want to query the index for the frustum corresponding to the fragment position in light-space,

so I know which depth texture I have to sample.

I got one that works, but it's very complicated.

Or should I just do a series of "if" statements.

My concern with that is, that inside a warp, only the body of one if-statement can be entered, which leaves all fragments idling, if they have different frustum.

Edited by stefthedrummer, 13 April 2014 - 04:16 AM.

### #2Ohforf sake  Members

Posted 14 April 2014 - 06:13 AM

absMax = max(abs(p.x), abs(p.y))

int index;
if (p.x == absMax) index = 0; else
if (-p.x == absMax) index = 1; else
if (p.y == absMax) index = 2; else
index = 3;

This should compile to a number of comparissons that all threads of the warp will perform equally, followed by four conditional assignments. If not, it should be possible to replace them with step functions like this:

absMax = max(abs(p.x), abs(p.y))

float findex = 3.0f;
findex = mix(findex, 0.0f, step(absMax, p.x));
findex = mix(findex, 1.0f, step(absMax, -p.x));
findex = mix(findex, 2.0f, step(absMax, p.y));

But I think that's more expensive then using if.

I guess it's one of the cases where you wish for a way to inspect the produced assembly of a shader...

As a side question, couldn't you render the depths into one big texture four times as long (concatenated) so you don't have to compute an index at all? Otherwise you will get the divergences anyways when sampling different textures.

Old topic!

Guest, the last post of this topic is over 60 days old and at this point you may not reply in this topic. If you wish to continue this conversation start a new topic.