And when it isn't a class then it might be worse. Since we know this isn't to be used for a class in this instance, for the purposes of what we have here, we can forego the reference. The ideal situtaion would use a type traits system to do it one way or the other but I'm not going into that here, you can look into the Yasli::vector if you're interested.

[quote='CableGuy']Correct me if I'm wrong but passing the dimensions of the array as a template parameter prevents you from writing something like this:
Array3D<char, width, height, depth> array;

assuming width, height and depth are not const?