It's official: I'll be buying a Mac

Published March 29, 2005
Advertisement
I've long contemplated satisfying my technolust and industrial design envy and plunking down the cold, hard cash for an Apple Macintosh personal computer. As I've used the machines (in school) and learned more about them, I've grown fonder and fonder of them and the way things are quite intelligently laid out and implemented. I've spoken about their approach to MDI previously, and I may have mentioned that the OS X memory manager and process scheduler is, as far as user experience is concerned, far superior to any other desktop operating system out there.

But it was reading about Spotlight just a few minutes ago that sealed the deal. See, Spotlight is a good 65% of what I had hoped to accomplish with ReComputing: as a pervasive, extensible indexing technology with an expressive front end (from what I've read), it makes the distinctions of where documents are stored a non-issue. With Smart Folders, it allows you to think in terms of logical collections (related materials) rather than physical ones (directories), although you have to manually have create them.

"Big deal," you might say. "It's only been announced, and you have event tried it out yet!" True. However, have you ever known Apple to put up a product announcement/preview on their site and then not deliver? Apple already has a cult following; it doesn't need to put hype on its site as the cultmembers all trek to Cupertino, CA to hang on every word Jobs speaks each year at MacWorld.

Now a lot of this is similar to what was originally announced/planned for Windows Longhorn, with WinFS supposed to be built on Yukon and NTFS, but it was all very confusing, and Longhorn isn't expected until 2006, and WinFS is not expected to debut in the 2006 release anyway. Spotlight is not as completely pervasive as my suggestion, which did away with notions like having to save files (you could identify a file or group of files if you wanted to, but it really wasn't necessary), directories and what not. I still think there's a good argument to be made for such a system, and I still think that a Windows NT 5+ kernel makes for the best underpinnings for such a system.

Apple seems to be taking hold of the industrial design, ergonomics and usability gauntlet(s). I wonder if anyone will take that as a challenge?

Yes, yes, Microsoft owns part of Apple, blah blah blah...
0 likes 1 comments

Comments

Washu
Quote:I've long contemplated satisfying my technolust and industrial design envy and plunking down the cold, hard cash for an Apple Macintosh personal computer. As I've used the machines (in school) and learned more about them, I've grown fonder and fonder of them and the way things are quite intelligently laid out and implemented. I've spoken about their approach to MDI previously, and I may have mentioned that the OS X memory manager and process scheduler is, as far as user experience is concerned, far superior to any other desktop operating system out there.

I've never been disapointed with Mac OS X. Although, I still find that I can crash it in but a few mouse clicks (even doing normal things, not sure why, it's a useful skill though) though. But it is pretty clean and straight forward in it's usage.
Quote:
But it was reading about Spotlight just a few minutes ago that sealed the deal. See, Spotlight is a good 65% of what I had hoped to accomplish with ReComputing: as a pervasive, extensible indexing technology with an expressive front end (from what I've read), it makes the distinctions of where documents are stored a non-issue. With Smart Folders, it allows you to think in terms of logical collections (related materials) rather than physical ones (directories), although you have to manually have create them.

Hrm, this sounds like something Novell was working on as well...suppose I should dig through some of their old emails and see if I can't find the name of the project
Quote:
"Big deal," you might say. "It's only been announced, and you have event tried it out yet!" True. However, have you ever known Apple to put up a product announcement/preview on their site and then not deliver? Apple already has a cult following; it doesn't need to put hype on its site as the cultmembers all trek to Cupertino, CA to hang on every word Jobs speaks each year at MacWorld.

Ahh, sounds like a good time to strike...
Quote:
Now a lot of this is similar to what was originally announced/planned for Windows Longhorn, with WinFS supposed to be built on Yukon and NTFS, but it was all very confusing, and Longhorn isn't expected until 2006, and WinFS is not expected to debut in the 2006 release anyway. Spotlight is not as completely pervasive as my suggestion, which did away with notions like having to save files (you could identify a file or group of files if you wanted to, but it really wasn't necessary), directories and what not. I still think there's a good argument to be made for such a system, and I still think that a Windows NT 5+ kernel makes for the best underpinnings for such a system.

Possibly, although I still think it will take a pretty big push to move users over. The unknown is frightening to most people, not an oportunity to exploit. I really wish they wouldn't announce these things until they were sure they could actually make the date. Tis annoying to be thwarted at every step.
Quote:
Apple seems to be taking hold of the industrial design, ergonomics and usability gauntlet(s). I wonder if anyone will take that as a challenge?

Yes, yes, Microsoft owns part of Apple, blah blah blah...

They have always been for ease of use. Idiotproofness and simplicity for as long as I recall.
March 29, 2005 11:59 PM
You must log in to join the conversation.
Don't have a GameDev.net account? Sign up!
Profile
Author
Advertisement
Advertisement