• Advertisement
  • entries
    383
  • comments
    1075
  • views
    353129

The plan part II

Sign in to follow this  

334 views

Now for the final of the introductory posts about what I plan to be doing. In this journal entry, I will outline what sort of games I plan to be working on in the next few years. As far as I can see, there are two approaches that I would like to undertake. One is the more sensible approach. The other is the extremely over-ambitious mega-project that seems quite common here on GameDev.Net. Since I like challenges, I wlll explain the over-ambitious path first.


One thing I would like to see more in game is an increased application of interactivity to the game experience. Many of my game ideas hinge around this point; having missions that are dynamically built to match the players abilities or their choices within the game up to that point, having music that blends in with the action seemlessly like an interactive film score, allowing the player to build their own character and personality, or having a storyline that is shaped by the decisions that the player takes. My ultimate goal is an RPG or adventure game which contains all these features; especially having the digital equivalent of storyteller that shapes the path of the story for the player.

Now I am sure a lot of you think that this goal is insanely difficult if not impossible to put in a game, and I would understand that. Nevertheless, I have spent a couple of years researching interactive storytelling techniques as part of a postgraduate degree, and pretty much my main conclusion is that it is bloody hard to do. Due to working alone and not really having much of an idea what I was doing, all I really have at the moment that is concrete are a bunch of text simulations so abstract that only an academic could love them. But I do have a greater awareness of the scope of the problem, and a bunch of ideas that I think just might work.

Since I don't want to abandon my interactive storytelling research, I would like to try and put in into a game. I have been thinking about what the next stage of my research needs to be, and I've decided that I need to build a character simulation to overlay a storytelling on top of. Every interactive storytelling approach that I have seen needs a model of character, and while my preferred approach is more plot than character based, I still need a simple character A.I. for it to work.

So I came up with my next project, codenamed "Project Hamlet" (I always give my projects codenames on the lines of "Project Something", since it takes forever for me to think of a proper title). At first, it was simply to be a digital village, with villagers living out their lives under a simple A.I. The graphics would be simple 2D, and I was thinking it would look a bit like an automatic Harvest Moon. But I got to thinking; since this will take me a while to implement, why not make it a proper game? With a little bit of tweaking, the simulation could be made into a village version of Tropico; build and run your own fantasy village! Throw in a few elements of Final Fantasy or Secret of Mana to make things interesting, and fuse the storytelling ideas to the strategy, and the game could actually be quite awesome.

However, there's a large number of drawbacks to this project, which I'm sure a lot of you can spot:

  • This game will take me a long time to make. Given my present skills, and the fact that I'm only working on this in my free time, I estimate that I will finish sometime between 2008 and 2010.

  • There's several huge games in the design that I need to iron out, such as how to make the whole thing fun.

  • There's always an amount of risk with A.I. research that I won't be able to figure out how to solve all the problems that crop up.

  • There's a fair amount of art assets and other work needed for a project of this scope too, which I'll need to learn.


In order to mitigate those risks, I've decided to make sure that the game design is water-tight before I get to the implementation. Then I'll design the software architecture in full on paper before I start writing the code, to make sure that it all fits together. If I plan this whole thing carefully, then I think it will be achievable. But there's a lot of risk here...


However, I've also been thinking a bit about my future. At the moment I'm a Ph.D. student working towards becoming an academic. In a few more years, if my study goes according to plan, I'll be a new Ph.D. entering the workforce in two years or so. While I'd like to be an academic, there's still a chance I mightn't find a postdoctoral position and have to look for other work. I've got other skills that allow me to work in other areas, and since I'm now 27 I'll have to start to stick to a career path (at least for a few years). But I have starting thinking; what about building games for a living, doing what I've always wanted to do? I'm not going to work for a commercial developer again, but there's always the path of the indie...

At the moment, I'm in my best position yet to train up the appropriate skills. Finally I've got a good scholarship allowance, so I don't need the part-time job to pay the bills anymore. I've got all the resources open to me as a Ph.D. student, such as discount books, software and hardware, the library system, and my present course encourages me to take up entrepreneurship training. I've already got software engineering skills that I can sharpen, and I can easily train up other skills in the two years I've got left.

Thinking it through, unlike the commercial industry I could even work on slightly quirkier stuff and still make a living. If I work solo and can sell 10,000 copies of a game every year and make a very nice living off that. It's rather risky, but it's something that I shouldn't just ignore. At the worst, it would be fun and provide a small bonus to a regular income working in a standard job.

However, for this path, I'll have to stick to simple games without the huge risk that fancy A.I. entails. I'd probably have to start with simple puzzle or action games, or something along those lines. The big ambitious "Project Hamlet" is not appropriate for this path.


What to do? I've been thinking about this, and I can't ignore either path. The interactive storytelling project has been my goal for ages, so I won't walk away from it now. But I also would like to try my hand at indie commerical development. So this is what I plan to do: I will treat "Project Hamlet" as my big, long term hobby project. That way I get all the fun of a big ambitious design, and get to do my interactive storytelling work. However, in order to learn the fundamentals of game development, I will also build a series of small games, with the purpose of both learning technology and working towards making indie games. I think that, properly managed, these two paths can complement each other, and I will build both better because of it.

So there you have it. This marks the end of the introductions of what I plan to be doing, and I can start making normal journal posts now about what my progress.


Addendum: if anyone is interesting in interactive storytelling, I put a list of resources up in the game design forum a couple of months ago. You can find the thread here.
Sign in to follow this  


4 Comments


Recommended Comments

I see. Work on the big one. As a hobby at least, it should occupy you for some time to come and certainly many good things must come from it. In parallel, you should work on little programs and document them as well. This will help you in getting a thorough grasping of the subjects. So I agree with you because that is similar to what I am doing! [grin]

Other than making games, what is it that you are interested in doing?

Share this comment


Link to comment
It's good to aim high enough that you'll be busy for a few years, but not so high that with all reasonability you'll probably never finish it. :/

The better you know your own abilities and limits, the easier it gets to plan out how ambitious you make your projects. If you take a look around at many of the other over-ambitious projects, you'll see little fruit borne of them.

Set your sights realistically, and go at them full force. It's always nicer to complete a game that's below your maximum ability than to fail a project above your ability. :)

Share this comment


Link to comment
Daerax: It's good to know that someone else is trying the same thing. I think it makes sense to have both a big project to keep me interested in design but complemented with little projects to get the feeling of completing games along the way.

As for what else I'm interested in, pretty much everything really. I guess I just like learning new things, which is one of the reasons why computer game development appeals to me; there's just so much knowledge that can be applied. But games have been the big thing that I've always been interested in (not just computer games, designing board games, card games, puzzles, physical activities, sports, gameshows etc.). That's also one reason why I like teaching too; it's easy to apply games and puzzles to.

HopeDagger: That makes sense, but the trouble is to figure out what your "maximum abilities" are. If I aim too low, I'll feel unchallenged. That's why working on both types of projects is a good idea, I think. If I'm working on the big ambitious project at the same time as the little project, I can see where finishing the little project will end up.

Share this comment


Link to comment
We are definitely interested in interactive storytelling! One of our eventual goals of our projects, especially now that we are coming out of the network plumbing phase. Come check out our project!

Cheers,
Roy
http://www.p2pmud.com

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Advertisement