if you are using an assembler
Author
those are some questions that it would really help me out if i got honest answers to them :
Please answer only if u use an assembler
a- what' your assembler?
b- why(that assembler)?
c- would you be willing to pay for another one?
d- why would you pay for another one?(e.g. : better support, better syntax, better docs, ...etc)
a) gas
b) It comes with my OS.
c) Not really.
d) I can't think of a reason that would prompt me to pay for one.
b) It comes with my OS.
c) Not really.
d) I can't think of a reason that would prompt me to pay for one.
a. nasm
b. Free, multiple output formats, including flat-form binary which is useful for making bootloaders/kernels
c. Pay for software? [wink]
d. I woudldn't pay for any assembler.
b. Free, multiple output formats, including flat-form binary which is useful for making bootloaders/kernels
c. Pay for software? [wink]
d. I woudldn't pay for any assembler.
Quote:Original post by MrEvil
a. nasm
b. Free, multiple output formats, including flat-form binary which is useful for making bootloaders/kernels
and it doesnt use the bloody evil gnu (at&t?) syntax
c. Pay for software? [wink]
d. I woudldn't pay for any assembler.
Quote:Original post by NarcistQuote:Original post by MrEvil
a. nasm
b. Free, multiple output formats, including flat-form binary which is useful for making bootloaders/kernels
and it doesnt use the bloody evil gnu (at&t?) syntax
c. Pay for software? [wink]
d. I woudldn't pay for any assembler.
Seconded.
Oxyd
Author
so, what would you like to add to nasm? (i think more syntax features like c structure style access??)
This topic is closed to new replies.
Advertisement
Popular Topics
Advertisement
