I''ve been thinking about the various RPG systems that are built into RPGs - the AD&D system, Fallout''s S.P.E.C.I.A.L system, the Ultima Underworld system, Daggerfall, and so on. Something that struck me fairly recently was this; why does the player have to know everything so precisely? Why can''t an RPG''s system of attributes and skills be hidden away and the player just given his/her character''s capabilities and the capabilities of the character''s surroundings in descriptive terms, based on the character''s awareness of him/herself and his/her surroundings? I''m interested in what people think of an RPG system where the player does not know the character precisely, only in general terms. After all, in real life, we can''t give our skills an exact numerical value. The player wouldn''t know the character only had 3 out of 20 HP - but he would know he was bleeding all over the place, perhaps lapsing in and out of consciousness. Of course, knowledge of the character''s state would come from some sort of hidden medical skill (which of course would not have an exact value, but could be described as highly developed, or mediocre, or just plain rubbish, or whatever). This also allows possibilities for personalities. A modest character may undervalue his own capabilities, and the player in turn may do so too. A particularly vain character may think he''s brilliant, leading the player into situations he can''t handle. However, would people like a game where there''s no discernable levels, no explicit experience and no skill points to spend when you level up?

Games which hide statistics have been done before but they involve just slapping a label on that ability, so instead of your sword skill being marked with 1-10, it would have different levels instead, like poor, medium, deathgod. To me this seems just as unrealistic as a game which shows you the numbers but just a little harder to make sense out of. Making RPG''s on a computer shouldn''t be just like a paper based RPG, but with a mouse. The whole point of a computer is that it is a giant calculator, the numbers should only be used by the computer, it serves no purpose to ket the player see them. I think your idea grbrg where the character can tell how good they are by the effect on the environment is a good one, it wouldn''t even need to be that explicit. The armour one is quite tough, but you could maybe implement a system where the player''s character could compare them and give their opinion on which is better, if they are not well verses in armour then they may end up getting it wrong.
The health system could be done in a way where instead of converting HP''s remaining into environmental effects (character crying out in pain, guts spilling out) the HP system could be scraped all-together. Instead a realistic damage system would work much better. If the player has a deepo wound in their leg then they will limp all over the place. If they are losing a lot of blood then they may lose conciousness or even die if they don''t recieve medical attention. Instead of overall HP''s, a damage level would be recorded for each location. That way they aren''t gping to die from losing their pinkie, but it could detriment skills involving their hands. If they take a crushing would to the leg that breaks it, then it should be quite obvious to the player that the leg is broken, you shouldn''t need to show them any numbers for that.

A skill system where the player has to learn skills to use them is very unrealistic, and without showing the player numbers it would be hard to do. Instead the player should be able to do every action by default, A few things might be so complicated that they have no chance with it, but things like swinging a club or using a shield shoiuld always be available, and depending on any training they recieve or how long they have been doing for, their proficiency should increase, so instead of missing all the time, the character would be able to successfully inflict deep wound or parry blows.

To many people, statistics are necessary to enjoy a game. They are the only way to show that you are getting anywhere. Most RPG''s are about building a character anyway. I would like to see if this is possible though.

Certainly if there were to be an RPG where the statistics are hidden (assuming one does not already exist), it shouldn''t be simply a case of replacing the numbers 1 to 10 with "rubbish" to "god-like". That I agree with totally.

If the RPG system behind the game was hidden though, you could have a level of complexity that would have been impossible with pen-and-paper RPGs. Everything, skills and attributes, could be more intertwinned and enmeshed, with the affects of imporving one skill echoing in others. It would be a headache for whoever had to design the underlying system, but it would improve any game using it.

Rather than having a skill-list with "Sword - good, Unarmed - average, Mace - poor, Medical - excellent" and so on, the character would simply detail what he believes he is good at and what he believes are his disadvantages - hiding the underlying ''skill chart'' (although long-time players of the game would eventually be able to hazard a pretty good guess).

For example:

"As with all who served in the armies of Drynnoth, Alinorn was trained in many forms of combat - with or without weapons. He always had a preference for the edged weapons, particularly the standard issue short sword, and fared poorly with those weapons that relied on bludgeoning the enemy. His real skills, however, lay in that of healing the wounds of his comrades in battle, causing him to be promoted to field medic. His experiences in this position were probably responsible for his hatred of war, causing him to leave the Drynnorian 4th Legion."

Of course any such descriptive text would have to be at least mildly interesting and not a simple ''insert words here'' affair.

Nobody said it would be easy.

A person can train for decades and never be particularly good at a skill - simply because they''re not cut out for it.

We''d discussed this before.. a long time ago.

The arguement i''m supporting is the same now as it was then.. we humans naturally put things in an order. We rank, classify, etc etc.
If you''ve had any biology then you know there''s genus, species.. etc. Our entire system of anything has ranks or something to it.. in order to have ORDER.
Imagine a military without a chain of command.. what then? No leader, no grunt.. you just ARE. That''s an RPG without stats.

Now, we had all admitted that a computer must use numbers to do things, so people MUST have stats. Otherwise you''re not making a computer game The problem was: do you show them or not (hidden stats.. like your topic here)? Well.. if you don''t show them, then people will speculate about them. People know they exist. To hide them is to merely open the door for interpretation. Then you''ve got people saying "do this for maximum effect" and newbies wasting hours on some guy''s hypothosis. I can''t see that that''d be fun.

Admittedly.. a single-player CRPG MIGHT stand a chance of having this and being successful. You do, however, still have to make an entire system for which the game will be based on; sometimes i think people simply want to use a system and they''re afraid it won''t seem right or fair to the player.. so they want to hide it. This is usually because the system isn''t normal "do this, gain this".
As long as you completely work out the system in a fair manner.. than i don''t think it''ll be a problem, hidden or not. But when hidden, people will speculate over and over again about what''s right and what''s not and what your system really is.

J
p.s. then some hackers will come along and find the stats and make a lil external module to the game which shows the stats