Original Post
I stumbled across this interesting article the other day. These people are going to build a monument sized clock that will keep perfect time for 10,000 years. At first I thought, "wtf? More tax dollars down the drain" but it turns out the project is being privately funded by Paul Allen. I know you guys are lazy so here are some quotes:
Quote:
It is a clock, but it is designed to do something no clock has ever been conceived to do—run with perfect accuracy for 10,000 years.
Quote:
For example, while nearly every mechanical clock made in the last millennium consists of a series of propelled gears, this one uses a stack of mechanical binary computers capable of singling out one moment in 3.65 million days.
Quote:
Made of stone and steel, it is more sculpture than machine. And, like all fine timepieces, it is outrageously expensive. No one will reveal even an approximate price tag, but a multibillionaire financed its construction,
Quote:Anyway their going to build it into a monument in the desert, read the article to learn more about that. What do you guys think of this thing? Is it practical? Will it last? What effect will it have on society if any? Will it make people more concerned about the environment and global warming? Will end war and cure aids? Discuss.
The clock idea originally sprang from Hillis's observation that in the 1980s, all long-range planning seemed to smack into a wall called the year 2000—the nice, round number seemed to be the omega point for everyone from software programmers to international policymakers: "Nobody could even think about the year 2030. It bugged me." Because technology began 10,000 years ago—there are pot fragments at least that old—Hillis decided to build a clock that would tick that long into the future, conceptually fixing humanity in the center of 20 millennia.