Sign in to follow this  
AmzBee

OpenGL The missing gap (light mapping)

Recommended Posts

AmzBee    485
Hi there, recently I have been learning to construct my own 3D engine using OpenTK and C#. Everything is going smooth as pie, I have a great system for using wavefront obj file's, and their material libraries. It correctly handles UV texture mapping / normal data for lighting, and I've even sorted out alpha blending (making sure to order faces correctly). The project uses immediate mode at the moment as VBO's can easily be implemented later, and I just want to focus on learning the theory.

Now it's time to move onto lighting and shadows, I've done a great deal of research into the matter already, and have decided that light maps are the way to go. From my
understanding and research, the following should be right (please correct me if i'm mistaken):



[list][*]A texture providing light data need's to be produced for each mesh.[*]Each triangle on the mesh requires a separate set of coordinates to allow the lumel's provided by the texture to be mapped onto each triangle surface.[*]Shadow's can exhibit jagged edges if the light map is of small resolution, as lumel projection is determined by the pixel centre, not pixel edges.[*]light map coordinate data needs only to be calculated once.[*]When calculating light map coordinate data, the maths must be done using plane projection.[/list]

Those of you who are experienced in this area I'm sure already can spot the gap's in my knowledge, but I'm hoping that I am not too far away, and that someone may be able to nudge me in the right direction. Today I found a tutorial on flip code [url="http://www.flipcode.com/archives/Light_Mapping_Theory_and_Implementation.shtml"]Light Mapping - Theory And Implementation[/url] , I think using it, I should be able to eventually understand the things I need to, though I have a few questions that I believe would help me learn a bit faster:



[list][*]Are there any less pseudo OpenGL examples of plane projection that people use, I don't mind the language, as long as it's strong typed (not pseudo).[*]I'm a bit confused on how lights relate to a light map, does this process assume that light's are static, therefore the usage of the light map texture,
this concept is part of what's confusing it for me.[*]Am I right in assuming that once I understand this process, I should be able to write a GLSL shader to map the lumel's based on the light map texture ID,
and light UV via a uniform variable or something similar?[*]Finally (and this one is a bit off-topic at the moment), but taking into account a semi-transparent face would not cast such a dark shadow, how would you
build this into this process? or would the colour information passed to the shader already account for the alpha channel.[/list]

Thanks for your time, I understand this is not the most straight forward question to answer, but I value your opinions, and very much look forward to some feedback.

Aimee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vilem Otte    2938
Hello,

definitely implement VBOs as soon as you'll get some time, it is just a matter of few hours and it will save you a lot of pain :).

Lighting and shadows are quite huge area of rendering. Lighting can be divided to two main parts - direct lighting and indirect lighting. As indirect lighting methods are quite complicated I won't recommend learning them now, it will be time to learn them later. On the other hand direct lighting can be divided to again two parts - static lighting and dynamic lighting (as a matter of fact, indirect lighting can be also static and dynamic, but well ... lets forget indirect lighting for now and leave it to future).

Static lighting can be achieved using F.e. light maps, they're not as easy as they seem to be, they can begin to be overcomplicated when it comes to unwrapping mesh to texture. Try rather to do base dynamic lighting, it is a bit easier to do. Also light maps are a bit outdated right now and they're not so common in modern game engines.

Dynamic lighting can be computed using immediate mode lights, or shading languages (I recommend learning shaders, and trying to do lighting in them). Of course once you do your first dynamic light, you should continue and learn what is deferred shading and forward shading. How to work with them, try both of them, etc.

Shadows are another topic and they're much harder to achieve. There is no absolutely robust solution in rasterizers, you can use shadow volumes (but well... they're not so good), or better shadow mapping (that can be very robust). Both shadow mapping and shadow volumes can be extended to work properly with semi-transparent objects, to be soft shadows, or even properly physically plausible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
    • By markshaw001
      Hi i am new to this forum  i wanted to ask for help from all of you i want to generate real time terrain using a 32 bit heightmap i am good at c++ and have started learning Opengl as i am very interested in making landscapes in opengl i have looked around the internet for help about this topic but i am not getting the hang of the concepts and what they are doing can some here suggests me some good resources for making terrain engine please for example like tutorials,books etc so that i can understand the whole concept of terrain generation.
       
    • By KarimIO
      Hey guys. I'm trying to get my application to work on my Nvidia GTX 970 desktop. It currently works on my Intel HD 3000 laptop, but on the desktop, every bind textures specifically from framebuffers, I get half a second of lag. This is done 4 times as I have three RGBA textures and one depth 32F buffer. I tried to use debugging software for the first time - RenderDoc only shows SwapBuffers() and no OGL calls, while Nvidia Nsight crashes upon execution, so neither are helpful. Without binding it runs regularly. This does not happen with non-framebuffer binds.
      GLFramebuffer::GLFramebuffer(FramebufferCreateInfo createInfo) { glGenFramebuffers(1, &fbo); glBindFramebuffer(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, fbo); textures = new GLuint[createInfo.numColorTargets]; glGenTextures(createInfo.numColorTargets, textures); GLenum *DrawBuffers = new GLenum[createInfo.numColorTargets]; for (uint32_t i = 0; i < createInfo.numColorTargets; i++) { glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[i]); GLint internalFormat; GLenum format; TranslateFormats(createInfo.colorFormats[i], format, internalFormat); // returns GL_RGBA and GL_RGBA glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, internalFormat, createInfo.width, createInfo.height, 0, format, GL_FLOAT, 0); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); DrawBuffers[i] = GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0 + i; glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0); glFramebufferTexture(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_COLOR_ATTACHMENT0 + i, textures[i], 0); } if (createInfo.depthFormat != FORMAT_DEPTH_NONE) { GLenum depthFormat; switch (createInfo.depthFormat) { case FORMAT_DEPTH_16: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT16; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_24: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT24; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_32: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT32; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_24_STENCIL_8: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH24_STENCIL8; break; case FORMAT_DEPTH_32_STENCIL_8: depthFormat = GL_DEPTH32F_STENCIL8; break; } glGenTextures(1, &depthrenderbuffer); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, depthrenderbuffer); glTexImage2D(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0, depthFormat, createInfo.width, createInfo.height, 0, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_FLOAT, 0); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MAG_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); glTexParameteri(GL_TEXTURE_2D, GL_TEXTURE_MIN_FILTER, GL_NEAREST); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, 0); glFramebufferTexture(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, GL_DEPTH_ATTACHMENT, depthrenderbuffer, 0); } if (createInfo.numColorTargets > 0) glDrawBuffers(createInfo.numColorTargets, DrawBuffers); else glDrawBuffer(GL_NONE); if (glCheckFramebufferStatus(GL_FRAMEBUFFER) != GL_FRAMEBUFFER_COMPLETE) std::cout << "Framebuffer Incomplete\n"; glBindFramebuffer(GL_FRAMEBUFFER, 0); width = createInfo.width; height = createInfo.height; } // ... // FBO Creation FramebufferCreateInfo gbufferCI; gbufferCI.colorFormats = gbufferCFs.data(); gbufferCI.depthFormat = FORMAT_DEPTH_32; gbufferCI.numColorTargets = gbufferCFs.size(); gbufferCI.width = engine.settings.resolutionX; gbufferCI.height = engine.settings.resolutionY; gbufferCI.renderPass = nullptr; gbuffer = graphicsWrapper->CreateFramebuffer(gbufferCI); // Bind glBindFramebuffer(GL_DRAW_FRAMEBUFFER, fbo); // Draw here... // Bind to textures glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE0); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[0]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE1); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[1]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE2); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, textures[2]); glActiveTexture(GL_TEXTURE3); glBindTexture(GL_TEXTURE_2D, depthrenderbuffer); Here is an extract of my code. I can't think of anything else to include. I've really been butting my head into a wall trying to think of a reason but I can think of none and all my research yields nothing. Thanks in advance!
    • By Adrianensis
      Hi everyone, I've shared my 2D Game Engine source code. It's the result of 4 years working on it (and I still continue improving features ) and I want to share with the community. You can see some videos on youtube and some demo gifs on my twitter account.
      This Engine has been developed as End-of-Degree Project and it is coded in Javascript, WebGL and GLSL. The engine is written from scratch.
      This is not a professional engine but it's for learning purposes, so anyone can review the code an learn basis about graphics, physics or game engine architecture. Source code on this GitHub repository.
      I'm available for a good conversation about Game Engine / Graphics Programming
    • By C0dR
      I would like to introduce the first version of my physically based camera rendering library, written in C++, called PhysiCam.
      Physicam is an open source OpenGL C++ library, which provides physically based camera rendering and parameters. It is based on OpenGL and designed to be used as either static library or dynamic library and can be integrated in existing applications.
       
      The following features are implemented:
      Physically based sensor and focal length calculation Autoexposure Manual exposure Lense distortion Bloom (influenced by ISO, Shutter Speed, Sensor type etc.) Bokeh (influenced by Aperture, Sensor type and focal length) Tonemapping  
      You can find the repository at https://github.com/0x2A/physicam
       
      I would be happy about feedback, suggestions or contributions.

  • Popular Now