• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
KaiserJohan

Passing references around internally in the engine

3 posts in this topic

Hello,

In my engine I thought about passing around references internally between the different subsystems rather than pointers. I liked the idea because I wouldn't bother with checking for null-ptrs == less code, it looks clean and I don't have to bother about the subsystems lifetime as they are tied to the Engine object.

But, I realised early on, initialization of the subsystems might be tricky due to some subsystems depend on others. I singled out two systems (so far) the memory and logging, that are common to all the (again, so far) subsystems.
I put those into a private class "EngineCore", as they would be constructed first and destroyed last.

Each other subsystem might have reference to those two.

Below is what it looks like so far:

[CODE]class Engine : EngineCore
{
public:
Engine();
~Engine();
bool Init();
bool Start();
bool Stop();
bool Destroy();
bool isRunning();
void Tick();
/* Managers */
EngineSettings& GetEngineSettings();
IMemoryManager& GetMemoryManager();
IRenderManager& GetRenderManager();
IGameObjectManager& GetGameObjectManager();
ILogManager& GetLogger();
/* Factories */
IThreadingFactory& GetThreadingFactory();

#ifdef ANDROID
static JNIEnv* mJNIEnv;
#endif
private:
bool mRunning;
bool mInitialized;
EngineSettings mEngineSettings;
/* Managers */
RenderManagerImpl mRenderManager;
GameObjectManagerImpl mGameObjectManager;
/* Factories */
ThreadingFactory mThreadingFactory;
};
[/CODE]


and

[CODE] /*
* The most vital parts of the engine, the logging and the memory management,
* which must be initialied first and destroyed last.
*/
class EngineCore
{
public:
EngineCore() { }
~EngineCore() { }
protected:
LogManagerImpl mLog;
MemoryManagerImpl mMemoryManager;
};
[/CODE]

so I can setup for example the ThreadingFactory (and in turn its members) for example like:

[CODE]ThreadingFactory::ThreadingFactory(ILogManager& logger, IMemoryAllocator& memAllocator) : mMemoryAllocator(memAllocator), mLogger(logger),
mCreatedThreads(memAllocator), mCreatedMutexes(memAllocator), mCreatedCondVars(memAllocator), mCreatedThreadPools(memAllocator)
{
}
[/CODE]


Now I have not gotten very far, but when I realised I had to put a special case for the Memory manager and LoggingManager, I started to get a bad feeling that later down the road, some wierd coupling between two subsystems might happen and I wouldn't know if I could avoid it.

So my question is, is it a sound design solution/hack to put the two core-systems into an EngineCore, and will this design eventually bite me later down the road?

EDIT: Im pasting the stuff directly from google code and the code segments are wierdly formated... why is this? Edited by KaiserJohan
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You should probably have a kind of singleton manager, responsible for the creation and destruction of all singletons, instead of putting them in other classes. They should be pointers instead of plain member variables. That way, you'll be able to control creation and destruction order. I'm not sure if I understood your problem correctly though...
-3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh well, you're right L. Spiro. It was early, I shouldn't have answered this question as I didn't even understood it correctly... sorry!
2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0