Sign in to follow this  
gamer19862013

OpenGL Will opengl 3d games run in a PC without a dedicated video card?

Recommended Posts

gamer19862013    119

I am new to game development. I read that opengl is used in games to directly communicate with GPU and thereby accelerating game performance. I had played games like The Mummy, Desperados 2 in a PC in the past without a dedicated graphics card. Both the games needed directx to be installed in the PC. Mummy game was smooth but i had to lower all the graphics settings for Desperados 2 to run the game. I haven't played any opengl based 3d game yet. My doubt is "Will opengl games run in PCs without dedicated video cards?" If they can run, what all features i won't be able to use in my game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Waterlimon    4398
Even if there is no dedicated GPU, you will practically always have at least some sort of an integrated GPU. They usually implement OpenGL worse than dedicated GPUs so you might face some problems (just like between AMD and nVidia cards), and of course performance will be worse.

And i believe opengl can RUN without a GPU too as software emulated. (ridiculously slow though)

If you are thinking of openGL versus directX support on integrated GPUs i think there is no other issues than possibly bad/incomplete implementation of the standard for some more specific features.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lightness1024    933

on windows you have microsoft GDI implementation, its like 15 years old, it implements OpenGL 1.1, and you can always use it.

Its very slow, its single threaded, but it works.

On linux you have mesa, you can hope to rely on something near OpenGL 3 spec.

On MacOS you have apple software renderer that supports OpenGL 2.1, or 3.0 on the very last OS. but its not much faster than microsoft version.

Back on windows, from windows 7 you have a truly performant multi threaded implementation of software DirectX, called WARP:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/gg615082(v=vs.85).aspx

 

other than that, I'm not aware of any third party that runs a newer opengl version in software on windows. but there may be one. (a windows port of Mesa ??)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Waterlimon    4398

on windows you have microsoft GDI implementation, its like 15 years old, it implements OpenGL 1.1, and you can always use it.

Its very slow, its single threaded, but it works.

On linux you have mesa, you can hope to rely on something near OpenGL 3 spec.

On MacOS you have apple software renderer that supports OpenGL 2.1, or 3.0 on the very last OS. but its not much faster than microsoft version.

Back on windows, from windows 7 you have a truly performant multi threaded implementation of software DirectX, called WARP:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/gg615082(v=vs.85).aspx

 

other than that, I'm not aware of any third party that runs a newer opengl version in software on windows. but there may be one. (a windows port of Mesa ??)

I believe the software implemented openGL version for windows has gone up a bit at some point.

 

And to OP, remember that these are when there is no GPU of any kind. You shouldnt even worry about the software implementation (unless you have a specific reason to) because most people have at least an integrated GPU, and if they only can use the software implementation, they probably wont be able to run your game anyways (other components too slow, software implementation of the rendering API too slow...)

 

I would just worry about how well it works when there IS a GPU (be it some old ATI card, mobile GPU with HP drivers, integrated GPU...), whether you need to support other than windows, what API you like more and so on. AFAIK their feature levels are similiar (if some feature exists, there is a way to use it via either API) on a given GPU, its just the way you access the feature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
blueshogun96    2264

Depends on your GPU, OpenGL drivers and implementation.  Most integrated GPUs (IMO, especially integrated ones) tend to have bad OpenGL drivers.  Intel is a pretty good example.  I wrote some 2D games using OpenGL and I had missing sprites and speed issues galore on Intel's integrated GPUs.  The NVIDIA or ATI integrated GPUs aren't too bad, but ATI's OpenGL drivers haven't been to great in my experience.  So far, NVIDIA is the best and what I'd recommend.  I don't think there are any more integrated GPUs that don't support a programmable pipeline anymore either.

 

I have 2 laptops (both Notebook and Macbook) using an integrated NVIDIA GPU and they work great.  People tell me that OpenGL on MacOSX sucks, but so far I haven't had any problems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By povilaslt2
      Hello. I'm Programmer who is in search of 2D game project who preferably uses OpenGL and C++. You can see my projects in GitHub. Project genre doesn't matter (except MMO's :D).
    • By ZeldaFan555
      Hello, My name is Matt. I am a programmer. I mostly use Java, but can use C++ and various other languages. I'm looking for someone to partner up with for random projects, preferably using OpenGL, though I'd be open to just about anything. If you're interested you can contact me on Skype or on here, thank you!
      Skype: Mangodoor408
    • By tyhender
      Hello, my name is Mark. I'm hobby programmer. 
      So recently,I thought that it's good idea to find people to create a full 3D engine. I'm looking for people experienced in scripting 3D shaders and implementing physics into engine(game)(we are going to use the React physics engine). 
      And,ye,no money =D I'm just looking for hobbyists that will be proud of their work. If engine(or game) will have financial succes,well,then maybe =D
      Sorry for late replies.
      I mostly give more information when people PM me,but this post is REALLY short,even for me =D
      So here's few more points:
      Engine will use openGL and SDL for graphics. It will use React3D physics library for physics simulation. Engine(most probably,atleast for the first part) won't have graphical fron-end,it will be a framework . I think final engine should be enough to set up an FPS in a couple of minutes. A bit about my self:
      I've been programming for 7 years total. I learned very slowly it as "secondary interesting thing" for like 3 years, but then began to script more seriously.  My primary language is C++,which we are going to use for the engine. Yes,I did 3D graphics with physics simulation before. No, my portfolio isn't very impressive. I'm working on that No,I wasn't employed officially. If anybody need to know more PM me. 
       
    • By Zaphyk
      I am developing my engine using the OpenGL 3.3 compatibility profile. It runs as expected on my NVIDIA card and on my Intel Card however when I tried it on an AMD setup it ran 3 times worse than on the other setups. Could this be a AMD driver thing or is this probably a problem with my OGL code? Could a different code standard create such bad performance?
    • By Kjell Andersson
      I'm trying to get some legacy OpenGL code to run with a shader pipeline,
      The legacy code uses glVertexPointer(), glColorPointer(), glNormalPointer() and glTexCoordPointer() to supply the vertex information.
      I know that it should be using setVertexAttribPointer() etc to clearly define the layout but that is not an option right now since the legacy code can't be modified to that extent.
      I've got a version 330 vertex shader to somewhat work:
      #version 330 uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix; uniform mat4 osg_ModelViewMatrix; layout(location = 0) in vec4 Vertex; layout(location = 2) in vec4 Normal; // Velocity layout(location = 3) in vec3 TexCoord; // TODO: is this the right layout location? out VertexData { vec4 color; vec3 velocity; float size; } VertexOut; void main(void) { vec4 p0 = Vertex; vec4 p1 = Vertex + vec4(Normal.x, Normal.y, Normal.z, 0.0f); vec3 velocity = (osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p1 - osg_ModelViewProjectionMatrix * p0).xyz; VertexOut.velocity = velocity; VertexOut.size = TexCoord.y; gl_Position = osg_ModelViewMatrix * Vertex; } What works is the Vertex and Normal information that the legacy C++ OpenGL code seem to provide in layout location 0 and 2. This is fine.
      What I'm not getting to work is the TexCoord information that is supplied by a glTexCoordPointer() call in C++.
      Question:
      What layout location is the old standard pipeline using for glTexCoordPointer()? Or is this undefined?
       
      Side note: I'm trying to get an OpenSceneGraph 3.4.0 particle system to use custom vertex, geometry and fragment shaders for rendering the particles.
  • Popular Now