When I was teaching someone to code, I had a hard time explaining why
if(Button == 200 || 300){
} didn't check if the variable was equal to at least one of the variables as if it were
if(Button == 200 || Button == 300){
}
The exact language was "Expression 2" if anyone was wondering. It's a thing for a game called "Garry's Mod".
When I was teaching someone to code, I had a hard time explaining why
if(Button == 200 || 300){ }didn't check if the variable was equal to at least one of the variables as if it were
if(Button == 200 || Button == 300){ }The exact language was "Expression 2" if anyone was wondering. It's a thing for a game called "Garry's Mod".
When I was trying to teach somebody to code they wanted to use 'or' to randomly pick between two numbers
value = 1 or 2Its understandable how a non programmer would expect this to work, so I didn't think he was dumb for doing it, but I still found it funny.
When I was trying to teach somebody to code they wanted to use 'or' to randomly pick between two numbers
value = 1 or 2
Its understandable how a non programmer would expect this to work, so I didn't think he was dumb for doing it, but I still found it funny.
I remember trying to do the same thing myself when I was learning c++.
When I was trying to teach somebody to code they wanted to use 'or' to randomly pick between two numbers
value = 1 or 2
Its understandable how a non programmer would expect this to work, so I didn't think he was dumb for doing it, but I still found it funny.I remember trying to do the same thing myself when I was learning c++.
You should be able to do something like that with variadic templates, though... make a proper templated class, and a function helper to simplify the syntax, and you should be able to do akin to:
if (multi(foo, bar, 4) == some_var) ...
public static DateTime getTommorowsDate()
{
Thread.Sleep(24*60*60*1000);
return DateTime.Now;
}
public static DateTime getTommorowsDate() { Thread.Sleep(24*60*60*1000); return DateTime.Now; }
I think Baby Jesus just cried.
int length= 0;
for(int idx = 0; idx < a.length; i++){
length++;
}
?System.out.println("length is : " + length);
Some Java code to get the length "cough" of the array 'a'. Nice!
See i could kinda understand someone doing this with a c++ iterator, but come on, was the programmer going "well if i go through the length of the array and count up then i'll get the length of the array!"Some Java code to get the length "cough" of the array 'a'. Nice!int length= 0; for(int idx = 0; idx < a.length; i++){ length++; }?System.out.println("length is : " + length);
See i could kinda understand someone doing this with a c++ iterator, but come on, was the programmer going "well if i go through the length of the array and count up then i'll get the length of the array!"Some Java code to get the length "cough" of the array 'a'. Nice!int length= 0; for(int idx = 0; idx < a.length; i++){ length++; }?System.out.println("length is : " + length);
Edit: aldo nice infinite loop in there =-P
So that you can avoid unnecessary code duplication, why not put this in a function?
int getIntegerValue(int n)
{
int ret = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
ret++;
}
return ret;
}
System.out.println("length is : " + getIntegerValue(a.length));
Work smarter, not harder.
