Quote:Original post by honeyQuote:However, having just sat my final school exams, I am rather pissed off at this attitude many people have that it is somehow the pupils' fault that these exams are easier. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but pupils don't normally set exams. Nor do pupils mark exams. Nor even, do pupils decide on cut-off grades. But despite all this it is clearly the pupils that are to blame for sliding exam standards.
in a sense the students are responsible.
many students take the easier subjects (just look at the current debate: Media Studies has overtaken Physics) because they want to get maximum grades with minimum effort, hence in order to attract students at all to the more important subjects (sciences, languages, ....) the standards have to be lowered to make the people without effort pass, otherwise the whole country would take philosophy, media studies, general studies and the like.
I don't know if I agree with that, personally. Looking at my fellow pupils, the people who take Media Studies and Business Management to get out of difficult subjects do it because the subject matter is easy. They don't do it because they will get better grades. Most of these people don't care what they get at all.
However going with your assumption, it was still the people in charge of the system who decided to lower exam standards. To my mind, that's a flawed method - it would be much better to increase the difficulty of the "easy" subjects. Either that, or make it easier to drop these deadweights on the educational system.
That's just my thoughts and I don't want to turn this topic into a flame war.