Why Visual C++ ?

Started by
20 comments, last by MaulingMonkey 16 years, 11 months ago
Quote:Original post by Diminished
Do you guys know of any helpful tutorials on the web?
Introduction to Debugging (in addition to giving you some excellent general debugging tips) will show you some of the debugging features in the Visual Studio IDE.

- Jason Astle-Adams

Advertisement
Quote:Original post by Paulius Maruska
I think he meant, that C++ (the language itself) is far more complicated than Visual Studio IDE.


Yes. I would've said Visual C++ if I meant the compiler. I'll edit my post for further clarity, though.

Quote:Actually, I agree - you can learn how to use an IDE in a few days, and learn the rest of it when you need it. However, to learn C++... Let's just say, that it takes a lot longer than a few days to learn C++ language.


Quoted for emphisis.

Quote:Original post by Dunge
I would recommend Visual Studio 2005, or .NET 2003 if you can get hand on them because Visual C++ (probably 6.0 you got) is way crappier.


For clarity: Visual C++ is part of Visual Studio, not distinct product lines.

Microsoft felt the need to just go stir crazy with the terminology mismashing:
e.g. "Visual Studio/C++ 5"'s package contained Visual Studio '97
e.g. "Visual Studio/C++ [.NET] 2005"'s package contains Visual C++ 8.0

Also, VS2005 Express Download Link.

But yes, VS6 is a horrible 9 year old prestandard piece of crap. Evidence of it's evil nature:


Hopefully he's using a modern version like we've been assuming :3.

The lexicon of myself and the people I generally know:
C++               :=  The (Standardized) C++ LanguageVisual C++    ___ :=  The Microsoft C++ CompilerVisual Studio ___ :=  The Microsoft IDEVisual ______  6  :=  A Joke


[Edited by - MaulingMonkey on May 21, 2007 2:32:36 AM]

This topic is closed to new replies.

Advertisement