• Announcements

    • khawk

      Download the Game Design and Indie Game Marketing Freebook   07/19/17

      GameDev.net and CRC Press have teamed up to bring a free ebook of content curated from top titles published by CRC Press. The freebook, Practices of Game Design & Indie Game Marketing, includes chapters from The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, and An Architectural Approach to Level Design. The GameDev.net FreeBook is relevant to game designers, developers, and those interested in learning more about the challenges in game development. We know game development can be a tough discipline and business, so we picked several chapters from CRC Press titles that we thought would be of interest to you, the GameDev.net audience, in your journey to design, develop, and market your next game. The free ebook is available through CRC Press by clicking here. The Curated Books The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses, Second Edition, by Jesse Schell Presents 100+ sets of questions, or different lenses, for viewing a game’s design, encompassing diverse fields such as psychology, architecture, music, film, software engineering, theme park design, mathematics, anthropology, and more. Written by one of the world's top game designers, this book describes the deepest and most fundamental principles of game design, demonstrating how tactics used in board, card, and athletic games also work in video games. It provides practical instruction on creating world-class games that will be played again and again. View it here. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing, by Joel Dreskin Marketing is an essential but too frequently overlooked or minimized component of the release plan for indie games. A Practical Guide to Indie Game Marketing provides you with the tools needed to build visibility and sell your indie games. With special focus on those developers with small budgets and limited staff and resources, this book is packed with tangible recommendations and techniques that you can put to use immediately. As a seasoned professional of the indie game arena, author Joel Dreskin gives you insight into practical, real-world experiences of marketing numerous successful games and also provides stories of the failures. View it here. An Architectural Approach to Level Design This is one of the first books to integrate architectural and spatial design theory with the field of level design. The book presents architectural techniques and theories for level designers to use in their own work. It connects architecture and level design in different ways that address the practical elements of how designers construct space and the experiential elements of how and why humans interact with this space. Throughout the text, readers learn skills for spatial layout, evoking emotion through gamespaces, and creating better levels through architectural theory. View it here. Learn more and download the ebook by clicking here. Did you know? GameDev.net and CRC Press also recently teamed up to bring GDNet+ Members up to a 20% discount on all CRC Press books. Learn more about this and other benefits here.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
ysg

Boston Marathon, a terror act

101 posts in this topic

Very sad. Seems a lot like the 1996 Olympic Park bombings at first glance.

Yes. It seems that whoever planned this, they were out to maim. Reports are coming in that doctors are pulling ball-bearings out of people in hospitals.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rate we've been going, this is just the beginning of the next generation's everyday life.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very sad.

It will be interesting to see who was behind it and what they wanted to achieve by pipe-bombing a crowd... Terrorism by definition has to have some kind of perceived purpose -- even that nutjob in Norway thought he would effect some kind of political change with his massacre -- otherwise it's not terrorism, it's just a random act of violence (like Columbine).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very sad.
It will be interesting to see who was behind it and what they wanted to achieve by pipe-bombing a crowd... Terrorism by definition has to have some kind of perceived purpose -- even that nutjob in Norway thought he would effect some kind of political change with his massacre -- otherwise it's not terrorism, it's just a random act of violence (like Columbine).

Please take steps to ensure that the US government adopts your definition of "terrorism." The one they're using is a little bit broken.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty sad, but I'm more worried about the countries the USofA will nuke for it.

 

Eh, I think it's more likely it's a crazed loner of either the domestic (Oklahoma City) or foreign (2010 Times Square attempt) variety.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rate we've been going, this is just the beginning of the next generation's everyday life.

 

Not really. Despite what the media tells you, statistically, we are living in the safest time in human history.

 

In real terms, the number of casualties by terrorism is barely significant. It was estimated that more people died by driving because they were afraid to fly than actually died in the planes on 9/11.

 

I'm not trying to belittle the awfulness of what happened in Boston. I grew up in Ireland during the 80s; I know what it's like. I just want to point out that we are not living in some awful age of terrorism, we're living in an age where we are now so safe that terrorism is news. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The rate we've been going, this is just the beginning of the next generation's everyday life.

You mean it wasn't this generation's everyday life?

 

I grew up in the UK in the 90's. The prospect of an IRA bombing was omnipresent - any day you took the subway, might be the day they hit again. You just didn't think about it too much, or your life would be crippled by anxiety.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


The rate we've been going, this is just the beginning of the next generation's everyday life.

 
Not really. Despite what the media tells you, statistically, we are living in the safest time in human history.
 
In real terms, the number of casualties by terrorism is barely significant. It was estimated that more people died by driving because they were afraid to fly than actually died in the planes on 9/11.
 
I'm not trying to belittle the awfulness of what happened in Boston. I grew up in Ireland during the 80s; I know what it's like. I just want to point out that we are not living in some awful age of terrorism, we're living in an age where we are now so safe that terrorism is news.


Not quite. Pipe-bombs (and terrorism in general) tended to make news all the time (not always world-wide), more so than violent crime or accidents (for example, from cars). Yes, we are now safer, but the logic in your statement is a tad off.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Truthfully, my prediction is that they will make a big show of trying to track down a foreign angle, but ultimately blame will be levied on a home-grown, right-wing extremist, gun nut, (media reporting and official statements have already been trending this way) and that this will be used as fuel for pushing gun control legislation.

 

But maybe my tin-foil-hat is just a little too tight today. Time will tell.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Supposedly the police had a Saudi national for questioning, but the police was denying it. But the news is still saying that the police had him. International politics?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Supposedly the police had a Saudi national for questioning, but the police was denying it. But the news is still saying that the police had him. International politics?

I heard it was some really bad reporting. I guess we'll just have to wait and see exactly what's up.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Supposedly the police had a Saudi national for questioning, but the police was denying it. But the news is still saying that the police had him. International politics?

I heard it was some really bad reporting. I guess we'll just have to wait and see exactly what's up.

 

Ah, I see. Damn you, Yahoo News!

 

I hope they figure out how this happen. Personally, at this moment in time, I think that's more important than why it happened.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope they figure out how this happen. Personally, at this moment in time, I think that's more important than why it happened.

The only thing about "how" that I know is it was supposedly gunpowder and shrapnel in a pressure cooker, hidden in a backpack. I'm not sure if that was both bombs or just one of them. Linky. Here's a nice summary/list of what's known. Edited by Cornstalks
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Truthfully, my prediction is that they will make a big show of trying to track down a foreign angle, but ultimately blame will be levied on a home-grown, right-wing extremist, gun nut, (media reporting and official statements have already been trending this way) and that this will be used as fuel for pushing gun control legislation.
 
But maybe my tin-foil-hat is just a little too tight today. Time will tell.

Most likely, this. Doesn't matter who really did it; what matters is who will be first to use it for political leverage to promote their agenda.

My own tin-foil hat thinking has me wondering what new monstrosity of an executive order (to follow up the Monsanto ball-sucking they already did) the White House is going to slip in under the cover of all this racket. Might want to keep our ears open the next couple of Fridays.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Truthfully, my prediction is that they will make a big show of trying to track down a foreign angle, but ultimately blame will be levied on a home-grown, right-wing extremist, gun nut, (media reporting and official statements have already been trending this way) and that this will be used as fuel for pushing gun control legislation.

 

But maybe my tin-foil-hat is just a little too tight today. Time will tell.

 

I tend to think you're right that it'll be used to push gun control, despite no guns being used in it.

Perhaps firework bans? Already done in some states (more for preventing accidental wildfires than terrorist attacks).

Maybe fertilizer tracking? Oh waitlaugh.png

 

Maybe they'll crack down on sales of nails and ball bearings so that only registered contractors can buy them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Truthfully, my prediction is that they will make a big show of trying to track down a foreign angle, but ultimately blame will be levied on a home-grown, right-wing extremist, gun nut, (media reporting and official statements have already been trending this way) and that this will be used as fuel for pushing gun control legislation.

 

But maybe my tin-foil-hat is just a little too tight today. Time will tell.

 

You're in terrible company.

 

3524kn.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Truthfully, my prediction is that they will make a big show of trying to track down a foreign angle, but ultimately blame will be levied on a home-grown, right-wing extremist, gun nut, (media reporting and official statements have already been trending this way) and that this will be used as fuel for pushing gun control legislation.
 
But maybe my tin-foil-hat is just a little too tight today. Time will tell.

 
You're in terrible company.

Wait, why is thinking that it'll probably end up being a domestic affair == thinking it was a false-flag attack?

No matter who's to blame, it will be used to push agendas. That's just what happens. If it's a domestic affair, it will surely be used to push more public safety laws, such as at least debating whether gunpowder should be sold alongside groceries.

Here in Australia, all the "not a pistol club gun" and "not a simple hunting rifle" type guns were banned after a mass-shooting like the Norwegian nutjob, to much protest from gun-fans claiming it was just a knee-jerk reaction (while we're at it though, the conspiracy for this one goes that the 'perpetrator' was actually a CIA patsy, and several snipers were involved... in a plot to "disarm the nation").

 

If it was a domestic attack, then the immediate worldwide reporting that a Saudi citizen had been arrested is very interesting. Psychological experiments show that even after a correction or retraction of a reported fact, the vast majority of us still beleive the original 'fact' at some unconscious level. Depending on how you're primed and questioned, you can give responses that show that you believe both the original and corrected facts somewhat simultaneously.

The point being, even if it's eventually officially blamed on a US citizen, many people will still feel a level of animosity towards Saudi Arabian men, for no rational reason.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, why is thinking that it'll probably end up being a domestic affair == thinking it was a false-flag attack?

 

He didn't say it would be a domestic affair, he said "blame will be levied on a home-grown, right-wing extremist, gun nut" (emphasis mine).  Maybe I'm reading it differently to you, but that says to me that a gun nut will be blamed, regardless of the truth.

 

It was more the tin-foil hat conspiracy brigade that I was getting at rather than the conspiracy itself.

No matter who's to blame, it will be used to push agendas.

 

100% agree. but that said.... not all agendas are created equal. For example,

If it's a domestic affair, it will surely be used to push more public safety laws, such as at least debating whether gunpowder should be sold alongside groceries.

would that really be such a bad debate? (note: not that I'm accusing you, more of a general question).

 

If it was a domestic attack, then the immediate worldwide reporting that a Saudi citizen had been arrested is very interesting. Psychological experiments show that even after a correction or retraction of a reported fact, the vast majority of us still beleive the original 'fact' at some unconscious level. Depending on how you're primed and questioned, you can give responses that show that you believe both the original and corrected facts somewhat simultaneously.

 

Completely agree. Especially when it's immediately HEADLINE NEWS: SAUDI IMPLICATED IN BOMBING and then several weeks later we may have made over reported the extent of the Saudi Arabian mans involvement.

Edited by ChaosEngine
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait, why is thinking that it'll probably end up being a domestic affair == thinking it was a false-flag attack?

 

Because of the language used:

Truthfully, my prediction is that they will make a big show of trying to track down a foreign angle, but ultimately blame will be levied on a home-grown, right-wing extremist, gun nut, (media reporting and official statements have already been trending this way) and that this will be used as fuel for pushing gun control legislation.

Rather than something like "look at foreign leads, but probably end up finding a right-wing extremist responsible." Levying blame implies that whoever they'll find didn't actually do it. Plus latent touchiness given the situation.

 

For my money, I think it's actually some domestic terrorist (and yes, right-wing). Islamic terrorism tends to favor martyrdom, and you would think if they were part of a network someone would have claimed responsibility now.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0